
"In How to Raise an Adult, Lythcott-Haims draws on research, conversations with educators and employers, and her own insights as a mother and student dean to highlight the ways in which over-parenting harms children and their stressed-out parents. She identifies types of helicopter parents and, while empathizing with parents' universal worries, offers practical alternative strategies that underline the importance of allowing children to make their own mistakes and develop the resilience, resourcefulness, and inner determination necessary for success. Relevant to parents of toddlers as well as of twentysomethings, this book is a rallying cry for those who wish to ensure that the next generation can take charge of their own lives with competence and confidence"
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23168823-how-to-raise-an...
This article has some key points in it that address the comments in this thread [1].
Excerpt:
"Working with the quote-unquote best and brightest, I was seeing more and more [students] who seemed less and less capable of doing the stuff of life. They were incredibly accomplished in the transcript and GPA sense but less with their own selves, evidenced by how frequently they communicated with a parent, texting multiple times a day, needing a parent to tell them what to do."
[0] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00OO2LJS2/ref=as_li_tl?ie...
[1] https://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-murphy-jr/want-to-raise-...?
Here are some similar articles in suitably similar publications:
http://time.com/3910020/the-over-parenting-trap-how-to-avoid...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julie-lythcotthaims/helicopter...
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/21/books/review/how-to-raise-...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/books/ct-prj-how-to...
It reads like PR, focusing on one author and their opinion (expressed in a recently released book) rather than a spectrum of writers / researchers. This is unfortunate given the historical references to 'helicopter parenting' and other writing that has covered the issue.
I'm not saying it wasn't an informative and interesting read, on the contrary, it was. I was merely pointing out the PR nature of the article.