Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Cover of When can you trust the experts?

    When can you trust the experts?

    Daniel T. Willingham

    "Clear, easy principles to spot what's nonsense and what's reliable. Each year, teachers, administrators, and parents face a barrage of new education software, games, workbooks, and professional development programs purporting to be "based on the latest research." While some of these products are rooted in solid science, the research behind many others is grossly exaggerated. This new book, written by a top thought leader, helps everyday teachers, administrators, and family members--who don't have years of statistics courses under their belts--separate the wheat from the chaff and determine which new educational approaches are scientifically supported and worth adopting. Author's first book, Why Don't Students Like School?, catapulted him to superstar status in the field of education Willingham's work has been hailed as "brilliant analysis" by The Wall Street Journal and "a triumph" by The Washington Post Author blogs for The Washington Post and Brittanica.com, and writes a column for American Educator. In this insightful book, thought leader and bestselling author Dan Willingham offers an easy, reliable way to discern which programs are scientifically supported and which are the equivalent of 'educational snake oil'"

    Other
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    1recommend
    2mentions
    2people
    2012–2013years
    50% recommend50% neutral

    Mentions per year

    20122013

    What Hacker News says

    1. tokenadultDec 2012
      This book chapter is an interesting read. It illustrates the importance of considering sample size, especially, when looking at preliminary research findings.

      After looking up the book from which this chapter is excerpted, I followed other recommendations from Amazon to another very useful book,

      http://www.amazon.com/When-Can-You-Trust-Experts/dp/11181302...

      When Can You Trust the Experts: How to Tell Good Science from Bad in Education by Daniel T. Willingham, a very astute psychologist with an interest in education policy.

      thread
    2. aikFeb 2013
      Interesting. So the idea is that critical thinking boils down to a combination of domain knowledge and specific metacognitive strategies, and so critical thinking isn't actually a skill.

      I sense that "critical thinking" has become somewhat of a blanket term. When business leaders and others call for better teaching of "critical thinking", what exactly do they mean? What exactly are they looking for?

      One answer could be that they expect the person to have knowledge/skill in the specific area a person is hired in. Although this would be great, I somewhat doubt this is it. Often it is expected that new graduates don't know much about the area they have been studying (from a professional sense).

      It could be thought that they're asking the impossible -- domain knowledge is necessary for critical thinking, but they don't care about the domain knowledge as much as the critical thinking. Since they can't be separated, the problem is rather that students just need to be taught more domain knowledge, or leaders need to change their expectations.

      Or, the education system has a poor understanding of the difference between critical thinking, domain knowledge, and metacognitive strategies. For one, personally I've never seen focus placed on metacognitive strategies, and not even a list of strategies that apply to any given discipline.

      I would think that one component of the expectation from business leaders is the ability to learn and adapt. The issue here is: That it's OK that the person doesn't have domain knowledge, but rather the issue is that they struggle to learn what they need, and lack the self-awareness and understanding to best know what to focus on going forward and how. In school we are always given the information we need to learn, and in my experience, rarely are we given a blank slate and asked to learn everything we need, in any domain/discipline necessary, to accomplish the job.

      Tokenadult -- have you read Willingham's book on this topic (When Can You Trust the Experts?) and would recommend it? I read his previous book (Why Don't Students Like School?) and found it fairly interesting, though there are elements I find misleading.

      thread

    Related

    Cover of The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance
    2009–2024

    The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance

    K. Anders Ericsson
    14 recommend · 27
    Cover of On intelligence
    2007–2026

    On intelligence

    Jeff Hawkins
    114 recommend · 228
    Who can you trust?Rachel Botsman
    2017–2018

    Who can you trust?

    Rachel Botsman
    0 recommend · 2
    Cover of The trusted advisor
    2009–2024

    The trusted advisor

    David H. Maister
    5 recommend · 10
    Cover of The science of trust
    2017–2024

    The science of trust

    John Mordechai Gottman
    3 recommend · 7
    Cover of How to Lie with Statistics
    2007–2026

    How to Lie with Statistics

    Darrell Huff
    63 recommend · 180
    Cover of The death of expertise
    2015–2026

    The death of expertise

    Thomas M. Nichols
    9 recommend · 21
    Cover of Site Reliability Engineering
    2016–2026

    Site Reliability Engineering

    Betsy Beyer
    86 recommend · 114