
The primary source for contemporary knowledge of Epicurean thought, Lucretius' great didactic poem theorizes that natural causes are the forces behind earthly phenomena and dismisses the concept of divine intervention.
I merely echoed the phrase used by the OP article (should have used quotes to make it clearer).
When you have had great Greek (Classical and Hellenistic) schools of philosophy and later practiced/extended by the Romans which could justifiably be called "cornerstone of Western culture", to point to a single book like The Bible and attempt to place it on the same pedestal is silly. In fact the opposite may be true viz. when western civilization broke away from the shackles of biblical thinking is when the "Scientific Revolution" happened leading to the science/technology driven world that we live in today.
Of course the bible had a lot of influence on western culture but one could argue whether it was not more detrimental than beneficial.
There is more to be learnt from Lucretius' De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things) than from The Bible.
In his day, Poggio, like Petrarch, was famous for the elegant beauty of his penmanship. Like the best of his craft, Poggio wrote not for speed but for beauty and timeless legibility.
While I have no plans to write in latin, this has convinced me that I want to learn how to write (and print) with style. (My cursive has always been horrific.) Since reading-to-learn is best done by taking notes by hand of whatever you want to remember, I'm hoping this pursuit will not only improve my retention but also my attention to detail since it will give me time to think out more fully what I think is important and how best to say it.
Second, a small nit-pick on the subtitle of the article: while Epicurus was a "rival" to the Stoics in a broad sense, Seneca (the Stoic writer) incessantly quotes Epicurus in his first 20 letters. Seneca even explicitly says he's "lifting from another's garden", where the "garden" is the reference to Epicurus (his school in Athens used to be located in a garden).
Lastly, there's the big caricature that the "Epicurean life" == unalloyed pleasure (which often implies "base pleasures"). However, as the introduction to On the Nature of Things says, "nobody was less of an epicure than Epicurus himself". Epicurus valued friendship and contemplative virtues a lot more.
Lucretius laid out The Nature of Things very well in 79 A.D.: https://philosophybreak.com/articles/why-death-is-nothing-to...
