Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    The end of historyFrancis Fukuyama

    The end of history

    Francis Fukuyama · 1989

    HistoryPolitics & Society
    Open Library
    Stats for nerds
    1recommend
    41mentions
    37people
    2009–2026years
    2% recommend76% neutral22% critical

    Mentions per year

    2009201120132015201720192021202320252026

    What Hacker News says

    1. tarboreusOct 2021
      Also, read the book instead of responding to the title. If you want a response to the idea of the end of history, read the end of The End of History.
      thread
    2. paimapiOct 2026
      I seriously doubt anything but political calculus about midterms and the sinking polling numbers for Republicans along with kickbacks from private military contracts towards certain connected members of the inner-circle went into the decision matrix for starting this war. It was never about whether or not it made sense - Fukuyama's The End of History has long been totally irrelevant, a little cherry on top of the neoliberal promise of global peace.
      thread
    3. nostrademonsMar 2026
      It's interesting that this article is funded by Francis Fukuyama, who famously wrote the "The End of History" [1] in 1992, which argued that the rules-based liberal democratic world order had won and there was no more need for geopolitical realism. This article represents a complete repudiation of his past beliefs, and basically an admission that he was wrong.

      Anyway, just as how Fukuyama was right for ~20 years and then very, very wrong, I suspect this essay is too. The U.S. mapped out all the game theory around nuclear war in the 50s and 60s. If you have too many states with nuclear weapons, nuclear war becomes inevitable, just like if you have too many firms in a market a price war becomes inevitable. That's why the U.S. and other nuclear powers have put so much effort into nuclear non-proliferation. North Korea may have been right in the short-term national interest sense to pursue and continue its nuclear weapons program, but the end result here is that most of humanity is going to die in a nuclear war, and we won't have such things as states and nations afterwards.

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_History_and_the_Las...

      thread
    4. crossbodyFeb 2026
      The concept of the "end of the exponential" sounds like a tech version of Fukuyama's much mocked "End of History". Amodei seems to think we’ll solve all the "useful" problems and then hit a ceiling of utility.

      But if you’ve read David Deutsch’s The Beginning of Infinity, Amodei’s view looks like a mistake. Knowledge creation is unbounded. Solving diseases/coding shouldn't result in a plateau, but rather unlock totally new, "better" problems we can't even conceive of yet.

      It's the begining of Inifinity, no end in sight!

      thread
    5. hagbard_cMar 2025
      > Europe ... saw lasting peace [in] the second half of the 20th century.

      Which happens to coincide with the lifetime of the majority of Europeans. War was mostly something which happened to other countries, in other places - not in 'civilised' Europe, surely?

      So yes, I am being serious - deadly serious. Most European countries neglected national defence after the fall of the Soviet Union in the expectation that Fukuyama was right when he claimed we were at 'The end of History' [1]. There is a good Swedish term for this condition: fredsskadad which translates to 'peace-damaged', the opposite of 'war-damaged'. It is the condition of a people who have gotten so used to peace being the norm that they assume that everyone everywhere else also considers peace to be the goal and thus no longer need to consider the possibility of ending up in a conflict.

      [1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/57981.The_End_of_History...

      thread
    6. alexissantosFeb 2025
      Millennials, I'd argue. During the 90s, culture at large painted a picture of stability and progress, all made possible by democracy. See Francis Fukuyama's The End of History for the kind of tone that permeated the time.

      As we Millenials have gotten older, we too have seen through the veil and realized the system isn't perfect. More importantly, perhaps, we've seen the wide range of ways people react to this imperfect system. Some have chosen to undermine its very foundations to get their way, leaving many to wonder what we're left with if -- to loosely quote Whose Line Is It Anyway -- the rules are made up and the points don't matter.

      thread

    Related

    Cover of The End of History and the Last Man
    2010–2026

    The End of History and the Last Man

    Francis Fukuyama
    1 recommend · 16
    Cover of Political order and political decay
    2015–2026

    Political order and political decay

    Francis Fukuyama
    8 recommend · 14
    Cover of The origins of political order
    2011–2026

    The origins of political order

    Francis Fukuyama
    22 recommend · 42
    Cover of End of the World Is Just the Beginning
    2022–2026

    End of the World Is Just the Beginning

    Peter Zeihan
    19 recommend · 38
    Cover of The fateful triangle
    2013–2026

    The fateful triangle

    Noam Chomsky
    6 recommend · 8
    Cover of End Times
    2023–2026

    End Times

    Peter Turchin
    5 recommend · 11
    Cover of The End of Faith
    2009–2026

    The End of Faith

    Sam Harris
    11 recommend · 21
    Cover of The Lessons of History
    2008–2026

    The Lessons of History

    Will Durant
    16 recommend · 26