
One of the world's leading authorities on war and international politics synthesizes the vast history of strategy's evolution in this consistently engaging and surprising account of how it came to pervade every aspect of life.
Concise, clear, and memorable statement that outlines a company's core purpose, values, and target audience.
> "made operational/actionable at a strategic level".
Taken the common definition from the first part of this plan, what do you think the average manager would do given that in the social sciences, operationalization is explicitly about measuring abstract qualities. [1]
"operationalization" is a compromise, trying to quantify qualitative properties, it is not typically subject to methods like MECE principal, because there are too many unknown unknowns.
You are correct that "operationalization" and "strategic intent" are not mutually exclusive in all aspects, but they are for mission statements that need to be durable across changes that no CEO can envision.
The "made operational/actionable at a strategic level" is the exact claim of pseudo scientific management theory (Greater Taylorism) that Japan directly targeted to destroy the US manufacturing sector. You can look at the former CEO of Komatsu if you want direct evidence.
GM:s failure to learn form Toyota at NUMII (sp?) is another.
The planning process needs to be informed by stratagy, but planning is not strategic, it has a limited horizon.
But you are correct that it is more nuanced and neither Taylor nor Tolstoy allowed for that.
Neo-classical org theory is when bounded rationality was first acknowledged, although the Prussian military figured that out long before Taylor grabbed his stopwatch to time people loading pig iron into train cars.
I encourage you to read:
Strategy: A History By sir Lawrence Freedman
For a more in depth discussion.
[1] https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sociology/Intro...
I find that reading books from those genres makes me question things more, which I find is a good exercise towards becoming a better thinker and learning how to piece ideas from different areas together.
For software, has got to be "Web Scalability for Startup Engineers" because it gave me a sweeping tour of most of today's software development, and various books on compiler development as building compilers taught me how to decompose things into smaller chunks.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Freedman [2] https://www.amazon.co.uk/Strategy-History-Sir-Lawrence-Freed...
The Feynman Processor (Gerard J. Milburn)
Strategy: A History (Lawrence Freedman)
https://www.amazon.com/Strategy-History-Lawrence-Freedman/dp...
Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker
Genius Foods by Max Lugavere
Nonviolent Communication by Marshall Rosenberg
The Framers Coup by Michael Klarman
Leadership by George MacGregor Burns
Strategy by Lawrence Freedman
Several books by Joseph Campbell or Peter Drucker. Can't go wrong with either.