Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    EEVblog #646 - Gravity Detection Using A Frequency Counter!

    EEVblog

    5 HN mentions · mentioned in 5 months, 2014–2023

    YouTube

    9:54 · 68K views · Jul 30, 2014

    Dave Jones of EEVblog demonstrates that a frequency counter can detect gravity through the 2g tipover effect on quartz crystal oscillators. He shows the reading shift as the instrument's orientation changes.

    HN links it as a hands-on demonstration that oscillator frequency depends on orientation relative to gravity.

    Hardware & ElectronicsElectronics & circuit designEveryday physics & science demos
    1. 9:07
      The Absurdity of Detecting Gravitational WavesVeritasium7.9M views • 9 years ago
    2. 1:02:29
      EEVblog #555 - 555 Timer KitEEVblog370K views • 12 years ago
    3. 39:56
      EEVblog #186 - Soldering Tutorial Part 3 - Surface MountEEVblog1.4M views • 15 years ago
    4. 27:46
      Laser diode self-mixing: Range-finding and sub-micron vibration measurementApplied Science492K views • 7 years ago
    5. 7:45
      Measure the mass of an eyelash with a DIY microbalanceApplied Science141K views • 12 years ago
    6. 28:03
      AT&T Archives: Similiarities of Wave Behavior (Bonus Edition)AT&T Tech Channel474K views • 14 years ago
    7. 19:59
      EEVblog 1547 (Part 1) - Contacting the Voyager 2 Space ProbeEEVblog71K views • 3 years ago
    8. 25:10
      How an Atomic Clock Really Works: Inside the HP 5061A Cesium ClockCuriousMarc465K views • 6 years ago
    9. 11:22
      Most People Don't Know How Bikes WorkVeritasium25M views • 4 years ago
    10. 2:48
      Series circuit - 3 LEDsHenryk Gasperowicz620K views • 14 years ago
    11. 54:35
      TSP #133 - Keysight UXR 110GHz BW, 256GS/s, 10-bit Real-Time Oscilloscope Teardown & ExperimentsThe Signal Path191K views • 8 years ago
    12. 11:07
      How to achieve nanometer precision in space?Breaking Taps749K views • 4 years ago
    13. 15:41
      How anti-theft tags work - magnetostrictionApplied Science886K views • 10 years ago
    14. 19:17
      How Wrong Is VERITASIUM? A Lamp and Power Line StoryElectroBOOM4.4M views • 4 years ago
    15. 33:52
      Open Source 8.5 Digit Voltmeter from CERN: Build and TestMarco Reps831K views • 5 years ago
    16. 9:57
      EEVblog #1107 - Shocking 4K BENQ Monitor Problem!EEVblog97K views • 8 years ago
    17. 4:20
      Why It's Impossible to Tune a Pianominutephysics4.1M views • 11 years ago
    18. 12:36
      Why the Muon g-2 Results Are So Exciting!PBS Space Time1.5M views • 5 years ago
    19. 13:01
      Pinging The Voyager 2 Probe (PART 2)EEVdiscover75K views • 9 years ago
    20. 15:48
      How to Detect Extra DimensionsPBS Space Time1.6M views • 8 years ago

    5 comments from Hacker News

    1. @gugagoreFeb 2019· in “TI Claims Breakthrough in BAW On-Die-Oscillators”

      Maybe if you can show me that if you flick an RC oscillator you can detect it, then I'll believe it's a silly distinction. Or if RC oscillators can detect gravity: this video I'm also curious what it would mean to you for two things to be doing "fundamentally different" things. Do you believe in the difference between a mechanical oscillator and an electrical oscillator? Mechanical oscillators like a spring/mass exchange energy between kinetic and electrical energy (a moving mass and a strained material). An RC oscillator exchanges energy between elements that store energy in an electric field and a magnetic field. That feels fundamentally different even in a four-fundamental-forces kind of manner.

      CitesView on HN
    2. @SamReidHughesJan 2019· in “Masahiro Kikuno, Japanese Independent Watchmaker (2017)”

      The Zenith Defy Lab watch has accuracy of -0.5/+0.5 seconds per day, which matches and/or beats quartz watches (that aren't thermocompensated). Rolexes, which have a classical movement design, are pretty close, promising -2/+2 spd. Quartz watches' accuracy also varies depending on orientation, for what it's worth. (It has an effect on the order of 1-2 seconds per year.) Related EEVBlog link: this video

      CitesView on HN
    3. @comboyMay 2015· in “1 second per second is harder than it sounds (2014)”

      My bad, I was before my coffee. One additional thing that wasn't yet mentioned is that freqency depends also on gravitation, so orientation of your motherboard could matter (for the curious - this video ). I'm not really sure it's big enough to matter though.

      CitesView on HN
    4. @formerly_provenNov 2023· in “Why the Position of a Watch Influences Accuracy (2020)”

      > Typical crystal acceleration sensitivities will range from about 1 x 10-10 per g for specially constructed precision SC-cut and AT-cut resonators to the order of 10-7 per g for tuning fork resonators. [LINK] Demonstration: this video

      CitesView on HN
    5. @snogglethorpeNov 2014· in “A clock that can detect tiny shifts in the flow of time itself”

      > Yeah, they're not sensitive to magnetic fields. But they do drift with temperature Also, gravity: this video

      CitesView on HN