Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Ben Kreuter RWC 2017

    Real World Crypto

    4 HN mentions · mentioned in 3 months, 2017–2018

    YouTube

    28:11 · 1.1K views · Feb 2, 2017

    A Real World Crypto 2017 talk by a Google engineer on using private set intersection to match ad views with in-store purchases. It describes privacy-preserving matching that avoids exposing personal transactions.

    Cited in threads about Google's purchase tracking as the technical source for how the matching might work.

    Systems, Networks & SecurityCryptographyPrivacy, surveillance & cybercrime
    1. 1:32:08
      Theory and Practice of CryptographyGoogle TechTalks74K views • 18 years ago
    2. 8:38
      Diffie-Hellman Key ExchangeArt of the Problem939K views • 14 years ago
    3. 48:02
      BlackHat USA 2011: SSL And The Future Of AuthenticityChristiaan00895K views • 15 years ago
    4. 29:12
      DEF CON 26 CRYPTO AND PRIVACY VILLAGE - Scott Arciszewski - No Way JOSE! Designing CryptographyDEFCONConference7.1K views • 7 years ago
    5. 1:06:36
      Computer Security 161 Cryptocurrency LectureNicholas C Weaver128K views • 4 years ago
    6. 24:20
      Satoshi Has No Clothes: Failures in On-Chain Privacy by Ian Miers (Devcon4)Ethereum Foundation5K views • 7 years ago
    7. 38:22
      Kim Nilsson - Cracking MtGoxTheBitcoinArmy47K views • 9 years ago
    8. 28:19
      Bitcoin 2012 London: Mike HearnIndependent POV79K views • 14 years ago
    9. 51:32
      Behind the Scenes of iOS SecurityBlack Hat127K views • 10 years ago
    10. 40:21
      Bitcoin - Unmasking Satoshi NakamotoBarely Sociable1.6M views • 6 years ago
    11. 24:28
      Ichthyology: Phishing as a ScienceBlack Hat38K views • 9 years ago
    12. 46:22
      DEF CON 19 - Moxie Marlinspike - SSL And The Future Of AuthenticityDEFCONConference11K views • 13 years ago
    13. 42:50
      DEF CON 18 - Moxie Marlinspike - Changing Threats To Privacy: From TIA to GoogleDEFCONConference7.3K views • 12 years ago
    14. 12:24
      Elliptic Curve Back Door - ComputerphileComputerphile554K views • 8 years ago
    15. 12:32
      Protecting Privacy with MATH (Collab with the Census)minutephysics451K views • 7 years ago
    16. 1:03:14
      re:publica 2015 - Aral Balkan: Beyond The Camera Panopticonre:publica21K views • 11 years ago
    17. 7:26
      This Video Is Sponsored By ███ VPNTom Scott5.9M views • 7 years ago
    18. 8:34
      Was YOUR vote counted? (feat. homomorphic encryption) - NumberphileNumberphile198K views • 9 years ago
    19. 1:10:01
      35C3 - The year in post-quantum cryptomedia.ccc.de8.4K views • 7 years ago
    20. 4:30
      Matthew Driver “Trust Is A Critical Component” | Perspectives | Channel NewsAsiaCNA Insider27K views • 11 years ago

    4 comments from Hacker News

    1. @vatueilMar 2018· in “Are you ready? This is all the data Facebook and Google have on you”

      > Google buys your credit card purchase data. A more accurate explanation of the scare quote: [LINK] > IIRC, this was announced as part of a program that uses double-blinded crypto that allows google to perform matching against this data in aggregate (Set intersection knowledge), but not individually identity of what a given user purchased, at the same time preventing the merchants from learning the identities of individuals either. > According to what they presented at a crypto conference, they went to great pains to avoid capturing personally identifiable transactions. The overall strategy is that Google Knows = Set A = (all ads shown for user X at Merchant Y) Merchant/Credit Card Proccessor Knows = Set B = (all $$$ paid by User X at Merchant Y), and that it is possible to cryptographically compute sum($$$ of A intersect B) without either side learning Set(User X). > Now whether you believe in the security of the algorithm and whether there are side channel leaks or attacks is another issue. > Edit: [LINK] > About 10 minutes in this video

      CitesView on HN
    2. @cromwellianJul 2017· in “Google’s new program to track shoppers sparks a federal privacy complaint”

      It's actually not given to Google in a user identifiable way. I am not privy to the details, but an overview was presented at a crypto conference: this video It looks to me like a form of homomorphic encryption where both the aggregate consumer transactions (people bought X at merchant M), and the aggregate Google ad information (people saw ad for X at merchant M) are encrypted and the set intersection is computed on the ciphertext revealing only the aggregate number of purchases, not the individuals. Now granted, there could be a security hole in this scheme as with any crypto-protocol, so it does need peer review, but the design, as stated in that YouTube presentation, is not to reveal to Google personal purchasing information, nor reveal to merchants, personal profile information. No personal financial data or purchasing information is supposedly transmitted. The problem with this kind of technology is that it is really difficult to explain to the public, and easily demagogued.

      CitesView on HN
    3. @cromwellianMar 2018· in “Are you ready? This is all the data Facebook and Google have on you”

      IIRC, this was announced as part of a program that uses double-blinded crypto that allows google to perform matching against this data in aggregate (Set intersection knowledge), but not individually identity of what a given user purchased, at the same time preventing the merchants from learning the identities of individuals either. According to what they presented at a crypto conference, they went to great pains to avoid capturing personally identifiable transactions. The overall strategy is that Google Knows = Set A = (all ads shown for user X at Merchant Y) Merchant/Credit Card Proccessor Knows = Set B = (all $$$ paid by User X at Merchant Y), and that it is possible to cryptographically compute sum($$$ of A intersect B) without either side learning Set(User X). Now whether you believe in the security of the algorithm and whether there are side channel leaks or attacks is another issue. Edit: [LINK] About 10 minutes in this video

      CitesView on HN
    4. @russell_hMay 2017· in “Google starts tracking what people buy in physical stores”

      A Googler gave a talk at Real World Crypto in January describing a system that might back this. The relevant part of the talk starts around the 10 minute mark: this video In short, they're able to compute the intersection of the set of users who have viewed an ad with the set of people who purchased a product in a store, without either party disclosing their side of the set.

      CitesView on HN