Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Was YOUR vote counted? (feat. homomorphic encryption) - Numberphile

    Numberphile

    5 HN recommenders · recommended in 7 months, 2016–2024

    YouTube

    8:34 · 198K views · Nov 7, 2016

    Numberphile interviews cryptographer Ron Rivest about end-to-end verifiable voting. He explains how homomorphic encryption and receipts let a voter confirm their ballot was counted without being able to prove how they voted to anyone else.

    HN commenters point to it in election-security threads as an accessible explainer of how a vote can be verifiable but not sellable.

    Systems, Networks & SecurityCryptographyRecreational & visual mathUS politics & elections
    1. 8:21
      Why Electronic Voting is a BAD Idea - ComputerphileComputerphile2.3M views • 11 years ago
    2. 5:31:07
      The Encryption Tightrope: Balancing Americans’ Security and Privacy: EventID=104573House Committee on the Judiciary174K views • 10 years ago
    3. 12:01
      Why Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad IdeaTom Scott5.1M views • 6 years ago
    4. 1:32:08
      Theory and Practice of CryptographyGoogle TechTalks74K views • 18 years ago
    5. 6:31
      Why Your Vote Doesn't CountCGP Grey7.9M views • 15 years ago
    6. 18:16
      Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?Stand-up Maths906K views • 5 years ago
    7. 3:35
      How our voting system (and IRV) betrays your favourite candidateThe Center for Election Science35K views • 12 years ago
    8. 1:02:38
      The Cardboard Box Reform - Nixon's Ghost Bill & A Crucial Flaw in DemocracyCRI109K views • 12 years ago
    9. 6:18
      Animated Voting MethodsUnify The Vote16K views • 9 years ago
    10. 4:27
      The Voting System That Should Replace Every ElectionCGP Grey4.7M views • 15 years ago
    11. 10:58
      Flaw in the Enigma Code - NumberphileNumberphile5.4M views • 13 years ago
    12. 17:46
      Why do Biden's votes not follow Benford's Law?Stand-up Maths3.7M views • 5 years ago
    13. 6:23
      How We Should Vote (Range Voting)Undefined Behavior43K views • 10 years ago
    14. 12:32
      Protecting Privacy with MATH (Collab with the Census)minutephysics451K views • 7 years ago
    15. 19:55
      Why was Biden's win calculated to be ONE IN A QUADRILLION?Stand-up Maths1.3M views • 5 years ago
    16. 14:03
      Simulating alternate voting systemsPrimer4.5M views • 6 years ago
    17. 6:47
      The Voting System That's Actually Too Good for Politicians to AllowCGP Grey10M views • 12 years ago
    18. 6:31
      You Can Win the Presidency With 22% of the VoteCGP Grey8.3M views • 14 years ago
    19. 40:21
      Bitcoin - Unmasking Satoshi NakamotoBarely Sociable1.6M views • 6 years ago
    20. 4:29
      The Voting System That Gives You Two VotesCGP Grey3.1M views • 15 years ago

    10 comments from Hacker News

    1. @PyroLagusJun 2019· in “A Peer to Peer Voting Algorithm [pdf]”

      > I've seen many proposed implementations but they all fail because if I can prove my vote to myself in any way, someone else can make me prove it to them either to buy or coerce my ballot. There is a way to prove that your vote was counted without being able to prove what you voted for by using homomorphic encryption. So, if someone wanted to coerce you or pay you for voting at all for whomever you want, they could do it, but that's fine. Microsoft is actually working with Galois on a system operating on this principle[1], and here's a good video explaining the basic concepts of how it works[2]. [1] [LINK] [2] this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    2. @YokoZarMay 2019· in “Protecting democratic elections through secure, verifiable voting”

      Right - the way you verify that is by asking for 100 sealed Alice envelopes, and opening 99 of them at random. If the machine was trying to trick you, you have a strong chance of catching it. You still walk out with a sealed envelope, and the would-be vote-buyer can't be sure it isn't a Bob envelope. This Numberphile video explains the process a bit more: this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @khrmAug 2017· in “To Protect Voting, Use Open-Source Software”

      I find Rivest's video( this video ) on homomorphic encryption as voting mechanism quite interesting. It looks more secure than pen and paper. All user get a receipt which they can verify is same during vote counting. They themselves can vote count using all others receipt. At the same time, they can't sell their vote as it's encrypted.

      RecommendsView on HN
    4. @pdkl95Nov 2016· in “Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results”

      Andrew Appel (CS Prof. at Princeton) also gave a very good talk earlier this year about the problems of electronic voting systems. [LINK] edit: Also, Ron Rivest was recently on Numberphile, where he talked about using homomorphic encryption to enable end-to-end verifiable voting. this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    5. @YokoZarMay 2019· in “Protecting democratic elections through secure, verifiable voting”

      The mechanism for voter verification is based on homomorphic encryption. Numberphile made a video on this topic recently, with a few basic explainers: this video

      RecommendsView on HN