Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?

    Stand-up Maths

    4 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2020–2021

    YouTube

    18:16 · 906K views · Nov 15, 2020

    Matt Parker of Stand-up Maths examines scatter plots that were claimed to show fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan's 2020 election. He recreates the analysis and shows that the pattern arises from comparing percentages across different bases, not from fraud.

    HN commenters cite it as a clear debunking of election-fraud statistics and as a warning against comparing percentages without context.

    AI, Machine Learning & DataData science & statisticsRecreational & visual mathUS politics & elections
    1. 17:46
      Why do Biden's votes not follow Benford's Law?Stand-up Maths3.7M views • 5 years ago
    2. 19:55
      Why was Biden's win calculated to be ONE IN A QUADRILLION?Stand-up Maths1.3M views • 5 years ago
    3. 6:18
      Animated Voting MethodsUnify The Vote16K views • 9 years ago
    4. 1:03:07
      Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 2010London Mathematical Society601K views • 12 years ago
    5. 4:27
      The Voting System That Should Replace Every ElectionCGP Grey4.7M views • 15 years ago
    6. 8:34
      Was YOUR vote counted? (feat. homomorphic encryption) - NumberphileNumberphile198K views • 9 years ago
    7. 1:23:30
      Democrats Need to Face Why Trump Won | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show733K views • 1 year ago
    8. 14:03
      Simulating alternate voting systemsPrimer4.5M views • 6 years ago
    9. 3:35
      How our voting system (and IRV) betrays your favourite candidateThe Center for Election Science35K views • 12 years ago
    10. 6:31
      Why Your Vote Doesn't CountCGP Grey7.9M views • 15 years ago
    11. 6:23
      How We Should Vote (Range Voting)Undefined Behavior43K views • 10 years ago
    12. 26:48
      Algorithmic Redistricting: Elections made-to-orderAlphaPhoenix584K views • 5 years ago
    13. 12:22
      Is Most Published Research Wrong?Veritasium6.2M views • 10 years ago
    14. 6:31
      You Can Win the Presidency With 22% of the VoteCGP Grey8.3M views • 14 years ago
    15. 11:01
      The Power of Big Data and Psychographics | 2016 Concordia Annual SummitConcordia733K views • 10 years ago
    16. 13:50
      What 40,000 Videos Tell Us About The Trending TabCoffee Break1.6M views • 7 years ago
    17. 12:32
      Protecting Privacy with MATH (Collab with the Census)minutephysics451K views • 7 years ago
    18. 21:14
      The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule3Blue1Brown1.4M views • 5 years ago
    19. 58:51
      DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about populationGapminder Foundation3.3M views • 11 years ago
    20. 3:38
      The Shortest-Splitline Algorithm: a Gerrymandering Solution [Bonus Video]CGP Grey692K views • 15 years ago

    6 comments from Hacker News

    1. @szcDec 2020· in “What we can learn from the latest indoor dining study”

      The way this is presented is going to be interpreted incorrectly. It is incorrect to compare percentages or probabilities like this. Here is a different example to try and illustrate the problem: Is 10% larger than 5%? It is not possible to answer this question if the basis on which the percentages are calculated are different. What if I said the 10% was 10% of whatever you last spent money on, but the 5% was 5% of Google's annual revenue. Which is larger? The same thing is happening in the above - it isn't okay to calculate the probabilities in two situations and then try to cross compare them for size. Sadly this error seems to be cropping up quite a lot! Matt Parker (Stand-up Maths) has an example of this and related to a recent election: this video . His explanation is likely better than mine.

      RecommendsView on HN
    2. @trevor-eDec 2020· in “YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread election fraud”

      I really hope something is done against Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai's content. He's been posting highly misleading/disingenuous election fraud material in order to gain a following, and people are believing it because he touts his PhD from MIT. Honestly at this point between his senate run and "Inventor of Email" scandal I'm surprised MIT hasn't had a response. For example, here's a video that debunks many of his claims: this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @nitrogenDec 2020· in “California Public Utilities Commission fired director who exposed missing $200M”

      I am replying for the sake of the hidden sibling comment: I don't watch any major media coverage of politics, but a mathematician and comedian I follow on YouTube (from a different country who presumably has no horse in the race) has analyzed some of the numerical allegations of fraud: - [LINK] - this video - [LINK]

      RecommendsView on HN
    4. @hinkleyMar 2021· in “Nuclear technology’s role in the world’s energy supply is shrinking”

      Don't. Compare. Percentages. Stand-up Maths called this out recently and it's good to mention. I think this might be the video: this video Give me the output and our total consumption please.

      RecommendsView on HN
    5. @ehsankiaJan 2021· in “U.S. Capitol Locked Down Amid Escalating Protests”

      > Can you link me to those majority of cases? this video [LINK] And this third one just shows how much of a joke some of the claims in the lawsuits are: [LINK] Like, this is basic high school level statistics they can't even get right.

      CitesView on HN