Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    AMD's most important product ever - Ryzen 9 4900HS

    Linus Tech Tips

    1 HN recommender · recommended in 3 months, 2020

    YouTube

    11:42 · 2.4M views · Mar 30, 2020

    Linus Tech Tips reviews AMD's Ryzen 9 4900HS mobile CPU in the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 laptop, calling it a landmark product. It highlights strong performance against Intel along with good efficiency and battery life.

    HN people cite it as a review showing Zen 2's efficiency and performance advantage over Intel in laptops.

    Hardware & ElectronicsComputer architecture & CPUsConsumer devices & gadgets
    1. 14:31
      I had given up on AMD… until today - Ryzen 9 3900X & Ryzen 7 3700X ReviewLinus Tech Tips4.9M views • 7 years ago
    2. 28:39
      AMD Ryzen Eco Mode Deep-Dive & Benchmarks on R9 7950X (Zen 4)Gamers Nexus422K views • 4 years ago
    3. 14:30
      I have some things to say - Core i9 & X299Linus Tech Tips2.8M views • 9 years ago
    4. 26:13
      The Smartphone CPU Review You NEED to Watch!Geekerwan346K views • 4 years ago
    5. 10:58
      DON'T Buy a Used Mining GPU! - $h!t Manufacturers SayLinus Tech Tips3.7M views • 5 years ago
    6. 21:52
      英特尔Lunar Lake深度评测:轻薄本有救了!极客湾Geekerwan198K views • 2 years ago
    7. 11:43
      Walmart's $250 laptop is AWESOME!Linus Tech Tips3.4M views • 6 years ago
    8. 17:39
      Linus builds Linus’ new PC!Linus Tech Tips3.7M views • 6 years ago
    9. 10:56
      How did Microsoft screw this up? - Surface Pro X (SQ2) vs M1 Macbook AirLinus Tech Tips2.8M views • 5 years ago
    10. 51:50
      [11] Mike Clark, AMD Zen Chief ArchitectTechTechPotato27K views • 5 years ago
    11. 14:05
      Userbenchmark - the April Fools that never ends2kliksphilip2.5M views • 5 years ago
    12. 23:32
      Industrial Strength High Performance RISC V Processors For Energy Efficient ComputingRISC-V International8K views • 8 years ago
    13. 46:36
      Sophie Wilson - The Future of MicroprocessorsErlang Solutions57K views • 9 years ago
    14. 20:08
      14nm and 7nm are NOT what you think it is - Visiting Tescan Part 3/3der8auer296K views • 6 years ago
    15. 59:21
      A Crash Course in Modern Hardware by Cliff ClickDevoxx21K views • 9 years ago
    16. 1:37:12
      [7] Jim Keller, Silicon Wizard 🧙‍♂️TechTechPotato67K views • 5 years ago
    17. 49:00
      Apple Event — November 10, 2020Apple14M views • 5 years ago
    18. 30:48
      Scumbag ASUS: Overvolting CPUs & Screwing the CustomerGamers Nexus1.5M views • 3 years ago
    19. 27:25
      “Hello, world” from scratch on a 6502 — Part 1Ben Eater5.9M views • 7 years ago
    20. 1:01:07
      The Ultimate Game Boy Talk (33c3)media.ccc.de242K views • 9 years ago

    5 comments from Hacker News

    1. @m12kDec 2020· in “AMD CPU sales skyrocket with Ryzen 5000 launch, leaving Intel in the dust”

      Have you considered an Asus Zephyrus G14? It comes with a Ryzen 9 4900HS and Linus (Tech Tips) seemed very impressed with it: this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    2. @blattimwindMar 2020· in “Ryzen 4000 Review”

      > Games are traditionally single threaded and hard to parallelize. On my 3900X I've seen even single player action titles utilize 16+ threads with overall CPU utilization reaching peaks of 80-90 %. Yes, it maybe be hard to parallelize game engines, but all major ones heavily use multiple cores. A bunch of years ago (4-5) people would recommend an i3-K dual core for gaming, because you could overclock it to 5+ GHz on air. That was sufficient for many titles back then. (And these i3s would sometimes give you higher FPS compared to the more expensive quad-core options). But a CPU like that is far too weak for newer titles. > You still can't beat intel at the high end. Both in terms of heat and performance. If you have a task that doesn't parallelize well, you can't beat intel. In terms of heat, that is, performance per Watt, Intel's high end is quite a bit worse than AMD's. It is true however that you can get slightly higher single-threaded performance out of Intel's highest-end CPUs, but not because they are more efficient (- AMD is better both perf/W and IPC-wise), but just by raw, unadulterated clock speed, pushing them to 5+ GHz. And that causes them to burn a lot of power. Zen 2 has consistently ~10-15 % higher performance clock-for-clock compared to Intel's best while achieving approximately 60-80 % higher perf/W. This LTT review captures the massive advantage Zen 2 has in efficiency: this video

      CitesView on HN
    3. @arcticbullApr 2020· in “Building a PC, Part IX: Downsizing”

      > I haven't found many machines built on those. It's a shame. The 4900HS just came out, so I assume we'll be seeing more of them! (LTT: this video )

      CitesView on HN
    4. @piinbinaryMar 2020· in “Ryzen 4000 Review”

      The LTT review [0] also had good things to say about the battery life. This CPU seems very power-efficient when compared to a 9980HK. [0] this video

      CitesView on HN
    5. @TazeTSchnitzelApr 2020· in “10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 4900HS mobile APU”

      LinusTechTips recently took a look at a gaming laptop with the same APU and were super impressed with its Intel-scorching performance: this video

      CitesView on HN