Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Stanford Seminar - Generalized Reversible Computing and the Unconventional Computing Landscape

    Stanford Online

    2 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2020–2021

    YouTube

    1:10:03 · 16K views · Oct 19, 2017

    A Stanford EE380 seminar by Michael P. Frank of Sandia National Laboratories on generalized reversible computing. It surveys unconventional computing approaches as transistor scaling nears its limits and energy efficiency stops improving.

    HN commenters cite it as an informative talk from a leading researcher in reversible computing, mainly in threads on reversible computers and energy efficiency.

    Hardware & ElectronicsComputer architecture & CPUsSemiconductors & chip manufacturing
    1. 1:31:28
      Stanford Seminar: Beyond Floating Point: Next Generation Computer ArithmeticStanford Online33K views • 9 years ago
    2. 1:04:53
      Jim Keller: Moore’s Law is Not DeadUC Berkeley EECS77K views • 7 years ago
    3. 14:46
      Robust-first computing: Beyond efficiencyDave Ackley7.9K views • 13 years ago
    4. 40:13
      "Programming a 144-computer chip to minimize power" - Chuck Moore (2013)Strange Loop Conference19K views • 5 years ago
    5. 1:26:02
      Stanford Seminar - The Soul of a New Machine: Rethinking the ComputerStanford Online76K views • 6 years ago
    6. 21:42
      Future Computers Will Be Radically Different (Analog Computing)Veritasium13M views • 4 years ago
    7. 1:34:44
      Jim Keller: Moore's Law, Microprocessors, and First Principles | Lex Fridman Podcast #70Lex Fridman742K views • 6 years ago
    8. 46:36
      Sophie Wilson - The Future of MicroprocessorsErlang Solutions57K views • 9 years ago
    9. 56:54
      Change w/ Jim KellerTenstorrent61K views • 3 years ago
    10. 20:13
      The Most Powerful Computers You've Never Heard OfVeritasium14M views • 4 years ago
    11. 1:19:38
      John Hennessy and David Patterson 2017 ACM A.M. Turing Award LectureAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)150K views • 8 years ago
    12. 1:00:34
      Chuck Moore's Fireside Chat 2011GreenArraysInc6.1K views • 14 years ago
    13. 1:37:12
      [7] Jim Keller, Silicon Wizard 🧙‍♂️TechTechPotato67K views • 5 years ago
    14. 1:01:20
      Indistinguishable From Magic: Manufacturing Modern Computer ChipsAndor Gafotas210K views • 14 years ago
    15. 47:52
      Finding the Missing Memristor - R. Stanley WilliamsThe Qualcomm Institute133K views • 16 years ago
    16. 1:10:58
      Trends in Deep Learning Hardware: Bill Dally (NVIDIA)Paul G. Allen School32K views • 2 years ago
    17. 26:13
      The Smartphone CPU Review You NEED to Watch!Geekerwan346K views • 4 years ago
    18. 1:06:20
      USENIX ATC '21/OSDI '21 Joint Keynote Address-It's Time for Operating Systems to Rediscover HardwareUSENIX46K views • 5 years ago
    19. 2:39:15
      Jim Keller: The Future of Computing, AI, Life, and Consciousness | Lex Fridman Podcast #162Lex Fridman1.3M views • 5 years ago
    20. 2:55:13
      Oral History of Gary Davidian, part 2 of 2Computer History Museum1.8K views • 7 years ago

    3 comments from Hacker News

    1. @jonbaerJul 2020· in “Are “reversible” computers more energy efficient, faster? (2004)”

      I think Michael P Frank is one of the more knowledgable people working on the subject, his Stanford talk is extremely informative ... this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @gbrown_Feb 2021· in “Reversible Computing”

      For anyone interested in the topic I highly recommend checking out Dr. Michael P. Frank's work. This video is good one to start with this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @GiggleLiuMar 2021· in “Reversible Computing”

      According to [Michael Frank's video]( this video ), there is an architectural overhead of ~500x that people can not get over (IIUC, this overhead only applies for gate based computing models). A reasonable gap between state-of-the-art gate based computing models and Landauer's limit should be 10^2-10^3. On the other side, reversible computing in general has 2-16 times computational overhead at the software level from my using experience. To save energy, reversible computing has to be at least ~10x more energy efficient at the instruction level.

      CitesView on HN