Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Samplerates: The Higher the Better, Right?

    FabFilter

    1 HN recommender · recommended in 3 months, 2021–2023

    YouTube

    29:22 · 571K views · Feb 27, 2020

    Dan Worrall explains when higher sample rates help in recording and mixing, and when they do not. He goes into oversampling versus higher sample rates, and aliasing in distortion plugins.

    Recommended as a clear explainer on Nyquist, aliasing and sample rate conversion artifacts.

    Mathematics & Theoretical CSInformation theory & signal processingAudio & video engineeringMusic theory, synthesis & production
    1. 23:53
      D/A and A/D | Digital Show and Tell (Monty Montgomery @ xiph.org)FL Studio647K views • 13 years ago
    2. 23:00
      Amiga Samplers : Budget dance music in 1990debuglive1.8M views • 6 years ago
    3. 1:54
      The Loudness WarMatt Mayfield Music2.7M views • 20 years ago
    4. 4:20
      Why Snow and Confetti Ruin YouTube Video QualityTom Scott10M views • 10 years ago
    5. 41:12
      Trackers: The Sound of 16-BitAhoy2.1M views • 4 years ago
    6. 3:36
      Hold music used to sound better. Here's why.Tom Scott2.9M views • 8 years ago
    7. 15:39
      The Best Easy Way to Capture Analog Video (it's a little weird)Technology Connections1M views • 7 years ago
    8. 26:33
      The Most Underrated AlgorithmVeritasium11M views • 4 years ago
    9. 24:13
      Gaslighting Your Fans w/ Dolby ATMOS™Benn Jordan889K views • 3 years ago
    10. 0:51
      Sample Breakdown: Daft Punk - One More TimeTRACKLIB2.2M views • 6 years ago
    11. 22:46
      Cassettes - better than you don't rememberTechmoan2.8M views • 10 years ago
    12. 1:16:21
      Notation Must Die: The Battle For How We Read MusicTantacrul1.8M views • 3 years ago
    13. 28:23
      The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT): Most Ingenious Algorithm Ever?Reducible2.3M views • 5 years ago
    14. 49:04
      Polyend Tracker // Review and Full Tutorial from Sample to Songloopop355K views • 6 years ago
    15. 42:59
      "How NOT to Measure Latency" by Gil TeneStrange Loop Conference119K views • 11 years ago
    16. 14:06
      Testing 432 Hz Frequencies (and temperaments)Adam Neely4M views • 7 years ago
    17. 22:02
      ORCA Sequencer Intro (Experimental Livecoding!)Allieway Audio93K views • 7 years ago
    18. 0:40
      Progressive decoding: JPEG vs JPEG XL vs AVIFJon Sneyers21K views • 5 years ago
    19. 11:48
      John Rauser keynote: "Statistics Without the Agonizing Pain" -- Strata + Hadoop 2014O'Reilly61K views • 12 years ago
    20. 42:15
      "Performance Matters" by Emery BergerStrange Loop Conference502K views • 7 years ago

    3 comments from Hacker News

    1. @gooseyardApr 2023· in “Nyquist Frequency”

      Dan Worrall made a fantastic video which touches on Nyquist. His youtube channel is a tremendous resource: this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @marcan_42May 2021· in “Apple Music Announces Spatial Audio and Lossless Audio”

      This is largely because MP3 is a crappy, old format. Try high-bitrate Opus on most samples and you're a lot less likely to get above-chance results on an ABX test, pretty much ever, at high bitrates. Ultimately though, lossy compression is always program-dependent ("program" here means the song, not the app). The encoders use psychoacoustic algorithms, and there is no way to prove they will perform well on all samples. So you will always be able to find corner cases where an encoder or format does worse and results in more audible artifacts; some of these might be encoder bugs, some might not. Therefore, it is fair to say that you might not want to rely on lossy compression for archival. But it is perfectly reasonable to use it to put music on devices to actually listen to. You say good mastering makes it easier to notice encoding artifacts, but actually, bad mastering can do that too. Over-compressed stuff (in dynamic range) with inter-sample peaks above 0dB can clip and distort after getting run through a lossy codec. As for lossless formats, though, anything above 48kHz 16 bits is complete nonsense for final delivery to consumers. All the "high resolution" stuff with higher sample rates and bit depths is just marketing bullshit, and this has been repeatedly demonstrated in trials (the well-designed ones anyway; there are plenty of terrible ones - no, comparing the 96kHz download to the 48kHz download of a song is not how you test this properly). Bit depths above 16 are use

      CitesView on HN
    3. @ilytJan 2023· in “Why Cassettes?”

      There is a bit more to that when we get to having to modify or convert audio formats, without "right" algorithms it might introduce some artifacts via aliasing this video

      CitesView on HN