Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    "How NOT to Measure Latency" by Gil Tene

    Strange Loop Conference

    9 HN recommenders · recommended in 20 months, 2015–2026

    YouTube

    42:59 · 119K views · Sep 28, 2015

    Gil Tene of Azul Systems explains common pitfalls in measuring latency and response time, including why averages mislead and the problem of coordinated omission. He introduces open source tools like HdrHistogram for better measurement and reporting.

    The canonical recommendation whenever percentiles, tail latency, load testing or averages come up, described by some as life changing.

    Software Engineering & LanguagesSoftware performance & optimizationTesting, debugging & developer tools
    1. 42:15
      "Performance Matters" by Emery BergerStrange Loop Conference502K views • 7 years ago
    2. 2:00
      Shouting in the DatacenterBryan Cantrill5.7M views • 17 years ago
    3. 1:04:48
      "Performance (Really) Matters" with Emery BergerAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)7.1K views • 6 years ago
    4. 22:51
      GopherCon 2015: Go GC: Solving the Latency Problem - Rick HudsonGopher Academy22K views • 11 years ago
    5. 38:20
      Twitter and Visual Studio RantMolly Rocket158K views • 6 years ago
    6. 40:03
      Google I/O 2013 - High Performance AudioGoogle for Developers62K views • 13 years ago
    7. 1:00:07
      CppCon 2017: Carl Cook “When a Microsecond Is an Eternity: High Performance Trading Systems in C++”CppCon358K views • 9 years ago
    8. 37:45
      #NoEstimates (Allen Holub)Allen Holub259K views • 11 years ago
    9. 14:05
      Userbenchmark - the April Fools that never ends2kliksphilip2.5M views • 5 years ago
    10. 2:50:14
      Simple Code, High PerformanceMolly Rocket464K views • 5 years ago
    11. 1:48:55
      The Thirty Million Line ProblemMolly Rocket326K views • 8 years ago
    12. 10:13
      The Problem with Time & Timezones - ComputerphileComputerphile4.4M views • 12 years ago
    13. 1:01:09
      Plenary: Performance Matters - Emery Berger - CppCon 2020CppCon33K views • 6 years ago
    14. 40:20
      "Testing Distributed Systems w/ Deterministic Simulation" by Will WilsonStrange Loop Conference56K views • 12 years ago
    15. 42:20
      "Stop Rate Limiting! Capacity Management Done Right" by Jon MooreStrange Loop Conference41K views • 9 years ago
    16. 40:55
      "Controlling Time and Space: understanding the many formulations of FRP" by Evan CzaplickiStrange Loop Conference69K views • 12 years ago
    17. 59:21
      A Crash Course in Modern Hardware by Cliff ClickDevoxx21K views • 9 years ago
    18. 46:37
      Zebras All the Way Down - Bryan Cantrill, Uptime 2017Code & Supply49K views • 9 years ago
    19. 1:03:55
      🚀 TDD, Where Did It All Go Wrong (Ian Cooper)DevTernity Conference619K views • 8 years ago
    20. 40:13
      Zach Tellman - Everything Will FlowClojureTV27K views • 11 years ago

    20 comments from Hacker News

    1. @RafuinoApr 2019· in “Averages Can Be Misleading: Try a Percentile (2014)”

      This topic always leads me to think about this great talk from Gil Tene on how NOT to measure latencies (basically, don't use averages!). this video I'm also a huge fan of how Dormando showed latency distributions in one of his recent Memcached Extstore posts. The default is 95th percentile but you can change the percentile to what matters to you (i.e. 99th percentile if you ask me!). Scroll down to see what he did and play with it. [LINK]

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @vikiomega9Aug 2016· in “Throughput vs. Latency and Lock-Free vs. Wait-Free”

      Doesn't this depend on how "tuned" your subcomponents are? If I had a system that's supposedly heavily optimized, I would simply start seeing the worst-case latency on a higher percentile, 99.9th and so forth. Gil Tene has an excellent talk[1] on this. [1] this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    3. @leetroutMay 2023· in “Grasshopper – An Open Source Python Library for Load Testing”

      We use locust at work but I HIGHLY recommend wrk for a very robust yet simple load testing tool. [LINK] And of course, this talk by Gil Tene is fantastic if you're interested in load testing stats this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    4. @wmfivApr 2020· in “Ask HN: Must Read from ACM Library?”

      This a life changing video by Gil Tene on this topic. Bottom line is because of the number requests to support a single customer "request", the high percentiles are the ones that actually matter. this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    5. @telotortiumFeb 2017· in “Unlearning descriptive statistics”

      Gil Tene has an entire talk about this point called "How NOT to measure latency" ( this video ). In many circumstances, a web service (either server or client) has large numbers of dependencies, so a user only has to hit 95th-percentile latency for one dependency to have their overall latency significantly hurt. In other words, users may encounter the "rare" bad case on a majority of requests. Thus, even higher percentiles should be tightly controlled in order to truly keep a web service's overall latency under control.

      RecommendsView on HN