Why Johnny can't read

What Hacker News says

1. lelanthranDec 2024
   > but no, it isn't new. There's a war between phonetic reading and 'whole word' reading.

   Older than many think.

   Search for and read "Why Johnny can't read", and then do the same for "Why Johnny still can't read".

   I have an almost-five child who is reading simple books with no pictures.

   Reading those two essays above, then buying "Teach your child to read in 100 days" and then simply working for 10m-20m each day since he was almost-three has resulted in a 5yo who reads as well as, or better than, many 8yo kids.

   Also, I moved off the DISTAR alphabet after about 6 months - the book is good, but use it as a good start, not as a complete teaching kit.

   Once you read those two essays you'll have a much better idea of why most children can't read and, most importantly, what to do about your kid at age 3.5yo - 4yo.

   Show morethread
2. WalterBrightApr 2023
   "Why Johnny Can't Read" from 1954 is as fresh as ever.

   https://www.amazon.com/Why-Johnny-Cant-Read-about/dp/0060913...

   thread
3. TrusteandoOct 2026
   Four forces: 1) Books like "Why Johnny Can't Read" (1955) and "Why Johnny Can't Add" (1973), 2) emotional intelligence, like in Goleman, 3) kids creating new social structures, a little further than Postman World Makers, 4) letting kids learn at different paces.

   I think the people in HN are like in such a school, they will to live in a world in which entry levels are not required but you need to learn the basic to understand where the complexity is, and at the same time, there is the need to exploit all the power that automation provides but without imagination other will, in the long term, take the lead.

   I don't know whether kids will have the possibility to adapt or if they will just live accepting whatever the dynamic of the AI imposes on them, but perhaps we have a small window to suggest some useful ideas for our schools, so how are we going to rethink schools?

   Show morethread
4. cypharJul 2026
   I've heard a lot of people argue that phonics are vastly superior to "whole word" techniques, and maybe that's true -- I'm definitely not an expert, though it is how I was taught English in Australia ~30 years ago.

   However, I find it quite hard to believe that it is the most important cause of the modern literacy rate issues in the US. Why? Because "whole word" teaching was the conventional wisdom since at least the 1950s[1,2]! Most articles on the topic reference the book Why Johnny Can't Read (1955) which was written to argue in favour of phonics as a response to (perceived?) child illiteracy at the time and claims (page 1):

   > Since the 1920s, most American schoolchildren have been taught to memorize the "appearance" of words, one after another, like Chinese characters, without reference to the sounds of the individual letters that make up each word.

   The reintroduction of phonics in the US first started as "balanced literacy" (phonics and "whole word", ideally tailored to students) in the 1990s and "science-based reading" (basically just phonics) properly started in the 2000s[1,2], which means that the argument that phonics would improve reading scores is on quite shaky ground (most children in the US today get taught phonics and most people >40 were probably taught with "whole word" teaching).

   [1]: https://wearealigned.org/brief-history-literacy-instruction-... [2]: https://www.lexialearning.com/blog/the-science-of-reading-vs...

   Show morethread
5. lelanthranDec 2025
   > I saw some stuff about literacy dropping because they went from teaching to sound out words, to, as I understand it, basically just showing the word and teaching how it's said, hoping kids would naturally pick up the rules.

   I've read a lot on this; it's "phonetics" vs "look-see".

   For a really depressing read, read "Why Johnny can't read", then the sequel "Why Johnny still can't read", and then look at the dates of those two essays.

   We already knew decades ago that some methods never worked in the past, and don't work now, but we still hope that they will work in the future, so we keep them around because there are powerful and mostly invisible (to the parents) interests in keeping these discredited methods around.

   Show morethread
6. michaeltJan 2020
   Which is named for "Why Johnny Can't Read" - a book from 1955 (by Rudolf Flesch, co-creator of the Flesch–Kincaid readability test)
   thread