Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Cover of Plans and Situated Actions

    Plans and Situated Actions

    Lucille Alice Suchman · 1987

    PhilosophyPsychology & Behavior
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    1recommend
    3mentions
    3people
    2013–2024years
    33% recommend67% neutral

    Mentions per year

    2013201520172019202120232024

    What Hacker News says

    1. EdwardCoffinAug 2024
      This passage particularly struck me: He noticed when a technician on a call began by examining copies that had been thrown in the trash and deduced from them that the problem with the machine was different from what the customer had reported. “The trashcan is a filter between good copies and bad,” one technician explained “Just go to the trashcan to find the bad copies and then… interpret what connects them all.”

      On a related note, I'd like to highly recommend Lucy Suchman's work, mentioned in this article as Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, but the updated version now called Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. The new version has several extra chapters and some other revisions. I've read it several times, and had my mind blown each time.

      thread
    2. humanistbotApr 2021
      Reminds me of Suchman's "Plans and Situated Actions" --- an anthropological study of plans and planning, which also has a lot of implications for AI. Resonances to that famous Eisenhower quote "Plans are nothing, planning is everything"

      https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/342380.Plans_and_Situate...

      thread
    3. cdentFeb 2013
      I have to say I disagree with the author's value assertion. It may true that people do treat computer interfaces in a social way, but whether this is useful (for many difference definitions of useful) is clearly open to debate. I wrote a paper about this a few years ago that pins the popularity of the idea of the computer as interactive artifact on Lucy Suchman and her work Plans and Situated Actions. The relevant paragraph is here: http://peermore.com/astool.html#nid21T (take off the fragment for the whole paper).

      If we're actually having some kind of debate about how to signifiy in an interface I'd probably choose "profile" and forego "my" and "your" as they imply a relationship that does not exist and a facility in the interface that is not possible.

      Given that most people aren't actually concerned about that and just want their stuff to be "nice" or "friendly" I'd pick one of "your" or "my", whichever fit in the grammar of the rest of the system, and be consistent.

      thread

    Related

    Cover of Human-machine reconfigurations
    2017–2024

    Human-machine reconfigurations

    Lucille Alice Suchman
    3 recommend · 3
    Cover of Rules for the direction of the mind
    2015–2025

    Rules for the direction of the mind

    René Descartes
    2 recommend · 5
    Cover of Mindstorms
    2008–2026

    Mindstorms

    Seymour Papert
    89 recommend · 201
    Cover of Thinking in systems
    2010–2026

    Thinking in systems

    Donella H. Meadows
    124 recommend · 202
    Cover of The Mind's I
    2007–2026

    The Mind's I

    Douglas R. Hofstadter
    36 recommend · 73
    Cover of Thinking with Type
    2010–2026

    Thinking with Type

    Ellen Lupton
    19 recommend · 26
    Cover of Behave
    2017–2026

    Behave

    Robert M. Sapolsky
    37 recommend · 84
    Cover of Thinking and deciding
    2008–2026

    Thinking and deciding

    Jonathan Baron
    6 recommend · 14