Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts Of 1844Karl Marx

    Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts Of 1844

    Karl Marx

    Economics & FinancePhilosophy
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    2recommend
    5mentions
    5people
    2013–2025years
    40% recommend60% neutral

    Mentions per year

    2013201520172019202120232025

    What Hacker News says

    1. claudiawernerJun 2019
      Also worth reading are Marx's critiques of Basiat and Say in his Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Marx is even critical of him in the Grundrisse where he contrasts Bastait and Carey, in which he derides both as bourgeois political economists. Far from seeing what is "not seen", they are obsessed with price and external appearances:

      >Bastiat, by contrast, presents fantasy history, his abstractions sometimes in the form of arguments, another time in the form of supposed events, which however have never and nowhere happened, just as a theologian treats sin sometimes as the law of human existence, then at other times as the story of the fall from grace. Hence both are equally unhistorical and anti-historical. But the unhistoric moment in Carey is the contemporary historic principle of North America, while the unhistoric element in Bastiat is a mere reminiscence of the French eighteenth-century manner of generalizing.

      thread
    2. cmrdporcupineFeb 2019
      Marx's "Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844" and "11th Theses on Feuerbach", Spinoza's "Ethics", and Adorno's "Negative Dialectic."
      thread
    3. almostgotcaughtOct 2025
      whenever people complain about someone being "merely happy with getting something to work and get it out the door before clocking out" i wonder to myself if i'm dealing with someone that has The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism on their nightstand, or has never read Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, or simply does not understand the significance of these two essays.

      like ... you expect people to actually be committed to "the value of a hard day's work" for its own sake? when owners aren't committed to value of a hard day's worker? and you think that your position is the respectable/wise one? lol

      thread
    4. RNCTXOct 2021
      I don't think he'd be surprised at America either.

      He wrote about America at some length, and accurately pointed out that America's ties to Europe would only last as long as there was free land west of the original colonies to take and give to its growing population, after which America would develop a factory working proletariat just as Europe had after the decline of feudalism, and then be far less welcoming of European immigrants as it sought to preserve the wealth the existing residents had built for themselves. In that respect his theory was proven true. Capital, not any sort of continental or feudal allegiance or concern for the future, would be the driving ideology.

      "Money, then, appears as this distorting power both against the individual and against the bonds of society, etc., which claim to be entities in themselves. It transforms fidelity into infidelity, love into hate, hate into love, virtue into vice, vice into virtue, servant into master, master into servant, idiocy into intelligence, and intelligence into idiocy.

      Since money, as the existing and active concept of value, confounds and confuses all things, it is the general confounding and confusing of all things – the world upside-down – the confounding and confusing of all natural and human qualities.

      "

      -- Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, "The Power of Money"

      thread
    5. jhuniFeb 2013
      Proletarians suffer from the four kinds of alienation Marx referred to in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (1) alienation from products (2) alienation from the act of production (3) alienation from ones own life (4) alienation from fellow laborers. The forms of alienations the bourgeoisie have to go through are not nearly as acute as the alienation of the proletariat.

      Perhaps the most important aspect of being as rich as a bourgeoisie is that you have a secure existence. You don't have to worry about finding a job, paying for health care, paying child support, paying rent on time so that you don't have to join the masses of homeless people living in the cold, or any of the other things ordinary people have to worry about. Having a secure existence is a major stress reliever and it makes your life better no question.

      thread

    Related

    Wage Labour and CapitalKarl Marx
    2013–2026

    Wage Labour and Capital

    Karl Marx
    6 recommend · 18
    Cover of Capital
    2012–2026

    Capital

    Karl Marx
    31 recommend · 132
    Cover of Capitalist Realism
    2015–2026

    Capitalist Realism

    Mark Fisher
    41 recommend · 100
    Capital Volume IKarl Marx
    2015–2021

    Capital Volume I

    Karl Marx
    4 recommend · 8
    The poverty of philosophyKarl Marx
    2017–2019

    The poverty of philosophy

    Karl Marx
    0 recommend · 2
    Cover of Das Kapital
    2007–2026

    Das Kapital

    Karl Marx
    40 recommend · 228
    Cover of An Austrian perspective on the history of economic thought
    2011–2016

    An Austrian perspective on the history of economic thought

    Murray N. Rothbard
    3 recommend · 4
    Cover of Basic economics
    2008–2026

    Basic economics

    Thomas Sowell
    88 recommend · 156