Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Cover of The Art of Being Right

    The Art of Being Right

    Arthur Schopenhauer · 2015

    Controversial Dialectic is the art of disputing, and of disputing in such a way as to hold one's own, whether one is in the right or the wrong - per fas et nefas. A man may be objectively in the right, and nevertheless in the eyes of bystanders, and sometimes in his own, he may come off worst. For example, I may advance a proof of some assertion, and my adversary may refute the proof, and thus appear to have refuted the assertion, for which there may, nevertheless, be other proofs. In this case, of course, my adversary and I change places: he comes off best, although, as a matter of fact, he is in the wrong.

    Design & UX
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    7recommend
    21mentions
    21people
    2012–2025years
    33% recommend67% neutral

    Mentions per year

    20122014201620182020202220242025

    What Hacker News says

    1. LargoLasskhyfvOct 2025
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right is the updated and 'modern' version of this.

      The power of Schopenhauer: Eristic Dialectic!

      thread
    2. skywal_lJun 2021
      The Art of Being Right - Schopenhauer
      thread
    3. FriedrichNJan 2021
      This reminds me of Schopenhauer's (rather funny) essay The Art of Being Right where he exposes various strategies by which people can be right, without actually being right.

      You can find an English translation here: http://coolhaus.de/art-of-controversy/

      thread
    4. haddrNov 2019
      Read Schopenhauer „The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument”. It’s a short read, but mind opening if you’re new to the subject. If it seems too long then just read some shortened version. If you still have some time after that then go to “list of cognitive biases” Wikipedia entry and continue there.

      I believe it is crucial to understand what tricks others are using in arguments. And also what’s our cognitive limits and logical fallacies when trying to understand the world.

      thread
    5. lolcNov 2019
      There is just the book for him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right
      thread
    6. loliveDec 2016
      The classic "The art of being right" [1] describes 38 different options to win an argument war. Fantastically cynical book. Highly recommended!

      [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right

      thread

    Related

    Cover of The art of controversy
    2008–2021

    The art of controversy

    Arthur Schopenhauer
    3 recommend · 6
    The world as will and representationArthur Schopenhauer
    2011–2026

    The world as will and representation

    Arthur Schopenhauer
    8 recommend · 34
    Cover of The wisdom of life
    2014–2021

    The wisdom of life

    Arthur Schopenhauer
    2 recommend · 4
    Cover of Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung
    2014–2025

    Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung

    Arthur Schopenhauer
    1 recommend · 3
    Cover of The Art of Loving
    2009–2025

    The Art of Loving

    Erich Fromm
    19 recommend · 58
    Cover of Essays and aphorisms
    2012–2024

    Essays and aphorisms

    Arthur Schopenhauer
    3 recommend · 5
    Cover of Drawing on the right side of the brain
    2008–2026

    Drawing on the right side of the brain

    Betty Edwards
    77 recommend · 160
    Being and TimeMartin Heidegger
    2008–2026

    Being and Time

    Martin Heidegger
    13 recommend · 55