
"[Taleb is] Wall Street's principal dissident.... [Fooled By Randomness] is to conventional Wall Street wisdom approximately what Martin Luther's ninety-nine theses were to the Catholic Church."--Malcolm Gladwell, The New Yorker Finally in paperback, the word-of-mouth sensation that will change the way you think about the markets and the world. This book is about luck: more precisely how we perceive luck in our personal and professional experiences. Set against the backdrop of the most conspicuous forum in which luck is mistaken for skill--the world of business--Fooled by Randomness is an irreverent, iconoclastic, eye-opening, and endlessly entertaining exploration of one of the least understood forces in all of our lives. — From the Trade Paperback edition.
Ian Ayres (2007) Super Crunchers: Why Thinking by Numbers is the New Way to Be Smart.
Joseph Healey (2020) Statistics: A Tool for Social Research [This is the textbook used in the class, which I highly recommend].
John Allen Paulos (1988) Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences.
Nate Silver (2012) The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail, but Some Don't.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb (2005) Fooled by Randomness, second edition.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb (2010) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, second edition.
Ian Ayres (2007) Super Crunchers: Why Thinking by Numbers is the New Way to Be Smart
Joseph Healey (2020) Statistics: A Tool for Social Research [This is the textbook used in the class, which I highly recommend]
Catherine Marsh and Jane Elliott (2008) Exploring Data: An Introduction to Data Analysis for Social Scientists, second edition
John Allen Paulos (1988) Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences
Nate Silver (2012) The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail, but Some Don't
Nassim Nicholas Taleb (2005) Fooled by Randomness, second edition;
_______ (2010) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, second edition
E.g. imagine in a bet you think there's a 99% chance of something being worth $1 and a 1% chance of it being worth $1 million. What's a fair price? It's a simple calculation - 0.99 * 1 + 0.01 * 1,000,000 = ~$10,000. That's you setting a price of $10k on something that you fully expect to be worth $1 99% of the time, and still coming out just fine.
So the actual debate should not be on 'guess the future' but rather on the odds of Starship delivering and estimating the impact this would have. And I think to many the answers are fairly easy - 'very nonzero' and 'very big.' It's akin to the NVidia/Apple stories, except in this case it's being somewhat priced into the market to begin with because it's somewhat more probable, and easier to foresee.
Fooled by Randomness by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
1. currency predictions are all more affected by randomness than anything else - this is why only people who want to lose their money invest it in, say, pesos or roubles (many have done it, many have "blown up" as per the author) 2. LLMs "predict" by following past trends, which are going to be fallible to randomness.
So, it may come to pass, or likely will not, as the odds against currency valuation predictions are enormous and random.