How children fail
A series of informal memos describing how typical grade-school pedagogy suppresses a child's innate desire to learn, leaving the child frustrated, confused, and fearing failure.
Stats for nerds
7recommend
25mentions
14people
2009–2025years
56% recommend44% neutral
Mentions per year
What Hacker News says
- Obligatory post of John Taylor Gatto's article The Seven-Lesson Schoolteacher:
https://selfdirectededucation.neocities.org/pdf/JTG%20The%20...
A former teacher of the year, Gatto became very influential in early homeschooling movements.
Parents or potential parents interested in education and schooling might also want to read Maria Montessori, and John Holt's books "How Children Fail" and "How Children Learn."
We as a species actually know quite a bit about raising children, socialization, and education. I think we get duped by our surrounding society and government institutions hijacking those goals in service of control, indoctrination, conformity, and maintaining class and power structures. Schools serve just as much, if not more, to prepare children to work as "productive" members of a capitalist culture, to do what they get told, as they do to teach our kids anything or help them learn to get along with other people. Call me an anarchist or Marxist, I don't care.
- I think it refers to this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/homeschool/comments/1i8utxu/intervi...
All three of my kids (now adults) got schooled at home, then went on to college. More unschooling than homeschooling -- we didn't follow a formal curriculum. Of the group of homeschooling families we socialized with in Portland most of the kids went on to college. Back then we would get college recruiters, including from Ivy League schools, showing up at homeschooling events. I suspect that has a lot to do with the relatively affluent middle class who can afford to homeschool, but it helps that homeschooled kids actually perform well at college.
You can find some videos and accounts of unschoolers with feral kids who can't read. That happens too but not the norm in my experience.
If you haven't already found them, get John Holt's books, especially How Children Learn and How Children Fail. Also Grace Llewellyn and John Taylor Gatto. I liked the book Deschooling Society by Ivan Illich.
- I home educated my kids, from about eight or nine to 16. In the UK where 16 is an important point of change (end of compulsory school age, and its when children in schools a critical set of exams).
A few things from my experience.
To a large extent the early years of home education are an extension of the teaching parents do anyway.
As they get older it takes less of your time. Children need to learn, but you need to facilitate rather than teach and/or pay for tutors.
You will need a lot of books, obviously different books at different ages. There are good books on every subject and its far too early to start thinking about exactly what books you need to use.
I have found its best to focus on doing things that are enjoyable and create a love of learning rather than thinking about syllabus. A Mathematician's Lament by Paul Lockhart and How Children Fail by John Holt are well worth reading. Things like memorising times tables and long division do not matter. No one uses handwwriting much in adult life (although it does still need to be legible for exams).
Part time supplementing is very different from home education. IMO that is also just an extension of parentings.
Home education is incredibly flexible. My kids have done GCSEs/IGCSEs (those UK exams we take at 16 in schools) in a variety of subjects with a choice no one school can offer, and many that few schools offer at all: Latin, astronomy and classical civilisation.
You can also do a lot of non-academic stuff. Both my daughters could solder by the time they were six or seven because I built circuits with them. My older daughter is now doing a degree apprenticeship (she has a job and a salary and her tuition fees paid while studying - very good for daddy's wallet!) in electrical engineering. We both credit HE with developing her interest in a subject very few girls do - she was the only girl in her A level (UK exams done at 18 - roughly equivalent to US APs) electronics class.
Finally, I am very glad I decided to home educate, and it has worked out extremely well for my kids. I think they could have achieved the same in terms of grades at school, but not the love of learning nor the self-discipline that they got from HE.
- The article misses the point of learning, confusing it with "education." I wonder how many members of the rationalist community have children.
I haven't read the book reviewed in the article, I no longer have school-age children. For anyone interested in the difference between learning and school/education, and some alternatives such as homeschooling:
Deschooling Society by Ivan Illich
How Children Learn and How Children Fail by John Holt
The Six Lesson Schoolteacher by John Taylor Gatto: https://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html
- > You clearly made choices in how you were raising your children, which means you were satisfying some constraints.
Well, yes, over time. At first we just wanted a child. We didn't have any plan. As a parent you have to make it up as you go -- the experience of other parents only goes so far. Before long I understood that I was dealing with an autonomous person, not someone I could mold or shape. Parents tend to overestimate the control and influence they have, which leads to conflict especially in the teen years and sometimes long into adulthood. I have friends my own age (past 60) who still resent their parents forcing them to play sports or go to violin lessons or sit through math tutoring.
You can find plenty of resources for homeschooling. I think of unschooling as a form of homeschooling. Traditional homeschoolers use a curriculum and try to duplicate at least some of the forms and rituals of traditional school at home. Unschoolers don't follow any curriculum, and involve their kids in the "real world" of adults rather than confining them in school or a simulation of it. The majority of homeschoolers in America do it for religious reasons, though you can find secular homeschooling groups in every city.
Some resources:
How Children Learn and How Children Fail by John Holt.
The Seven Lesson Schoolteacher by John Taylor Gatto (online) https://www.wanderings.net/notebook/Main/SevenLessonsTaughtI...
Dumbing Us Down and Weapons of Mass Destruction by John Taylor Gatto.
Deschooling Society by Ivan Illich.
The Unschooled Mind by Howard Gardner.
Anything by Maria Montessori.
We kind of fell backwards into it. Our first child went to Montessori school at first, she loved it. Then we moved and couldn't find a Montessori school that had openings (many have long waiting lists), so we enrolled her in public school. After a few weeks she got in trouble for reading a book in class "above her grade level" according to the teacher. She was in second grade reading a Nancy Drew book, bored waiting for the other kids to learn how to read. She cried about going to school after that because the teacher shamed her in class. So we didn't make her go and let her do her own thing. We told the school we planned to move, they never followed up. She went on to (easily) get a high school diploma and went to college. We didn't send our next two kids to school but left the option open, they decided to go later but mainly because of their friends.
We gradually found out about organized homeschooling groups and joined those, which led to lots of opportunities for sharing ideas and letting the kids socialize and play.
It helped that I was able to support all of us so my wife didn't have to work at a job, she did most of the work handling the kids. Unfortunately homeschooling only makes sense for middle- and upper-middle-class families who don't need school to provide day care while they work two jobs. We knew families with stay-at-home dads, and couples who had flexible jobs that allowed them to alternate. I came to believe that kids should have a parent around as much as possible, as a role model and person to answer questions, which is why I objected in the first place to the idea of hiring a nanny or sending kids to school.
- Compulsory school serves multiple purposes:
- Taxpayer subsidized day care so parents can go to work
- Keeping teens out of the labor pool
- Keeping kids and teens off the street causing trouble
- Social and political indoctrination
- Imparting some minimum level of basic education
Motivated students and their parents can get a lot out of the school system, mainly admission to good universities. Schools used to provide vocational “tracks” for students not focused on university, but that fell away in the ‘70s.
A lot of kids just do the time and get through it, or maybe drop out, possibly learning some useful information and skills, but too often just wasting a lot of time.
You might look into Deschooling Society by Ivan Illich, John Holt’s books How Children Fail and How Children Learn, and Grace Llewellyn’s The Teenage Liberation Handbook. John Taylor Gatto, a former Teacher of the Year, wrote this great essay The Six-Lesson Schoolteacher about school:
Related
HOW CHILDREN LEARN
3 recommend · 10
Are we getting smarter?
1 recommend · 6
The unschooled mind
2 recommend · 2
Deschooling Society
26 recommend · 90
Dumbing Us Down
15 recommend · 37
How children succeed
7 recommend · 14
Why Nations Fail
74 recommend · 146
