Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Cover of Toxic sludge is good for you

    Toxic sludge is good for you

    John C. Stauber, John Stauber, Sheldon Rampton · 1995

    Toxic sludge is good for you blows the lid off of today's multi-billion-dollar propaganda-for-hire PR industry, revealing how public relations wizards concoct and spin the news, organize phony "grassroots" front groups, spy on citizens and conspire with lobbyists and politicians. --Publisher.

    Business & ManagementBiology & Medicine
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    5recommend
    8mentions
    6people
    2015–2026years
    88% recommend13% neutral

    Mentions per year

    2015201720192021202320252026

    What Hacker News says

    1. Tangurena2Apr 2026
      > People seem unable to make up their mind if AI is very dangerous or is it not.

      This is a propaganda tactic. For decades, tobacco companies claimed that there was no evidence that smoking was bad for one's health. Then, only after losing dozens of lawsuits did the propaganda switch to "but everyone knew for 100+ years that smoking was lethal".

      One can read about it by reading Trust Us, We're Experts, or Toxic Sludge Is Good For You, or the other books written by the authors.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_Us,_We%27re_Experts

      https://www.prwatch.org/tsigfy.html

      thread
    2. MyFirstSassFeb 2024
      Watch the pretty mainstream movie "Get Me Roger Stone" about how gamed certain segments of the population is to mobilise them politically, maybe read the book "Toxic sludge is good for you" about the history of astroturfing in the US - all what used to be mainstream views, that propaganda and fake grassroots group mobilisation has been rampant for over 100 years, then realise how many fed and mil connected people were in Q, and how there's been hundreds of thousands people rioting right in front of the white house with no one getting near the entrance, then suddenly a tiny group of people waltz in with cameras all over - makes absolutely zero sense in a historical or organisational context but already functions as judicial and political leverage almost weekly.

      I'm not concluding anything, but sceptical speculation about state-, military pretexts, or corporate action like this didn't use to be as fringe as it is today, where it will quickly earn you an "enemy actor", "russia bot", "china bot", or "enemy of the state" badge - the oldest play in the book in my opinion, echoing mccarthyism, ww2 state sponsored xenophobia or similar strategies.

      Since Bernais et. al. wrote about propaganda and the mouldable psyche of the masses for state power and profit in the 1920's it's like these perspectives have been forgotten.

      In my view this is how business and politics have always worked until the modern "everything is just chaos and randomness" discourse conveniently became the paradigm - and conveniently that is for the ownership classes - even rather tame marxist historians or a plurality of historiographies outside of the tiny anglosphere bubble would laugh at this perspective and say the state and the upper classes have always and will always conspire in class warfare, propaganda and PR to spin, mobilise and smokescreen resource political and judicial strategies that people wouldn't support organically via PR playbooks, campaigning and event driven political action.

      thread
    3. kossTKRSep 2020
      Let me recommend the book "Toxic Sludge Is Good For You" - despite the rather silly title that book is an extremely thorough historical examination of PR, AstroTurfing and in general a rather shocking unveiling of an aspect corporate power that most people know very little about - from Edward Bernais right up until about when the internet really took over.

      Lobbying, policy writing, press release creating, corrupting and local power infiltrating hidden complexes was already completely all encompassing and dangerous to everything "scientific" and everything "true" 20 years ago.

      I can't even begin to imagine how advanced that system has become today with social media, fake grassroots, corporate sponsored think tanks and targeted advertisement. Rather scary.

      thread
    4. kossTKRFeb 2019
      This thread is weird to me.

      How are so many in the dark about the fact that it's mainly corporate PR that are behind all off the confusion about dangerous consequences from both energy-, agri-, and chemistry business?

      Energy companies have known about potential catastrophic consequences for years, scientists have known, people living in nature have known.

      People are "confused", doesn't get the urgency or simply ignore the issue because of PR, astroturfing and corporate campaigns.

      It's all because of huge corporations hiring armies of lawyers, marketing people and greenwashing lobbyists that write both the laws and the news. (*see my sources if you doubt this )

      Forget about the politicians and the consumers - they have been massively propagandized by a conglomeration of enormous agricultural and energy sector companies for half a century.

      Seriously it's __well described and documented__ and has been since Exxon found out about climate change and hid its own findings in the 70's.

      How do you some of you people know so little about the culprit, and instead blame mostly consumers or the politicians who are bought by corporations?

      There is no debate and hasn't been for decades - the culprit is growth capitalism and the mega-corps that ruthlessly lie and distort in service of profits.

      This has happened for over 100 years when US car manufacturers killed public transport in the US, and Edward Bernays created modern public PR, that apparently is working frighteningly well still.

      Read:

      Merchants of doubt https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7799004-merchants-of-dou...

      Toxic Sludge Is Good For You https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/659246.Toxic_Sludge_Is_G...

      Exxon Has Known for over 40 years: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-...

      thread
    5. mimixcoJan 2019
      PR comes from PR companies. A great book on this topic is "Toxic Sludge Is Good For You," which I highly recommend. PR is designed for mass consumption.

      If you poke around in the documentation on their websites which is designed for developers, you'll see that these computers cannot be used for general problem solving, which any computer (a Raspberry Pi, for example) can.

      If you go further and actually sign up for a trial account on these services (which I have done), you'll find that the "problems" they can solve are quite contrived and, as the OP points out, only consist of issues where the programmer already knows the solution.

      Quantum computers are not as useful as a Raspberry Pi. That's it in a nutshell.

      thread
    6. kossTKRFeb 2016
      Let me reccomend "Toxic sludge is good for you". http://www.prwatch.org/tsigfy.html. Its a book about PR in the twentieth century.

      Basically the corporate elite has been hiring armies of secret and hidden agencies, front groups, lawyers PR people, ex-army agents etc. for decades. They smear , threaten, distort and ultimately change the publics perception of reality.

      thread

    Related

    Cover of Toxic
    2019–2023

    Toxic

    Neil Nathan
    3 recommend · 3
    Cover of Good to Great
    2007–2026

    Good to Great

    Collins, James C.
    71 recommend · 210
    Cover of Bad Pharma
    2012–2025

    Bad Pharma

    Ben Goldacre
    42 recommend · 83
    Cover of Bullshit Jobs
    2013–2026

    Bullshit Jobs

    David Graeber
    159 recommend · 628
    Cover of Bad Science
    2009–2024

    Bad Science

    Ben Goldacre
    35 recommend · 57
    Cover of The vital question
    2015–2026

    The vital question

    Nick Lane
    66 recommend · 135
    Cover of In Defense of Food
    2008–2026

    In Defense of Food

    Michael Pollan
    40 recommend · 83
    Cover of Good  calories, bad calories
    2008–2025

    Good calories, bad calories

    Gary Taubes
    91 recommend · 202