
"Dr. Kay Redfield Jamison, an internationally recognized authority on depressive illnesses and their treatment, knows this subject firsthand. At the age of twenty-eight, after years of struggling with manic-depression, she attempted to kill herself. Her survival marked the beginning of a life's work to investigate both mental illness and self-inflicted death."--BOOK JACKET. "Weaving together a psychological and scientific exploration of the subject with personal essays about individual suicides, Dr. Jamison in this book brings not only her compassion and literary skill but all of her knowledge, research, and clinical experience to bear on this devastating problem. In tracing the network of reasons underlying suicide, she gives us astonishing examples of the methods and places that people have chosen to kill themselves and a startling look at their journals, drawings, and farewell notes. She also brings us vivid insight into the most recent findings from hospitals and laboratories across the world; the critical biological and psychological factors that interact to cause suicide; the new strategies being evolved to combat them; and the powerful but still insufficiently used treatments available from modern medicine."--BOOK JACKET.
This is quite the problem, yes.
But ultimately the perceived intractability and the root cause of the difficulty of investigating this phenomenon is the subjective nature of the reports of the symptoms. Clearly _something_ is up, we can see that from macro-behavioural patterns and cases of attempted suicide -- but these diagnostics are crude.
What is needed are robust bullet-proof objective diagnostics[1][2]. It's great that we've progressed beyond "humours" and "hysterics" and "demons" but compared to other areas of modern medical research we are practically in the stone ages as the article points out.
For instance: we could have genetic, bio-chemical, neuro-chemical, and/or neuro-wiring diagnostics. Any others? Until there is a comprehensive set of biological markers scientists are of course going to be reluctant to research this. It's unfortunate but I can't say I blame them.
And what if the majority of major depressive disorders turn out to be down to wiring? And what about the perfectly natural reactive depression one gets when someone close to you dies or when a relationship breaks up and you lose your partner and/or your kids. Are we now saying that we oughtn't feel this way? And what if the way we've structured society plays a large role in our individual well-being and wellness, what then? What if it turns out to be part of the human condition, as is perhaps the case with existential depression[3]?
Absolutely the best book I've read on depression and suicide is Night Falls Fast[4] by Kay Redfield Jamision, a Johns Hopkins psychiatry professor. It's a few years old now but I don't think that the topics and themes in it will ever date even though the science in it might. It is filled with compassion, it strives for precision. I cannot recommend this book highly enough.
Welcome your thoughts on the matter.
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19396703
[2] http://www.newsweek.com/first-blood-test-depression-holds-pr...
[3] http://www.davidsongifted.org/db/Articles_id_10554.aspx
[4] https://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jamison-night.html
Honest question: do you recommend the book to folks suffering from non-trivial depression? As in: is there some sort of "happy ending" within the precise facts it lays out? Asking for a friend...