
A reassessment of World War II as the "last imperial war" and a call for a more global perspective on the war.
Munich was an "alliance" of Great Britain und Germany (and sort of Poland).
Then Germany and the Soviet Union allied against Poland.
Then Great Britain and The Soviet Union allied.
>The Russian paranoia hasn't changed much since Ivan The Terrible, long before neocons.
Prisoners of Geography is pop science but I like the chapter about Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoners_of_Geography
https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/106335/blood-and-ruins-by-ov...
Second, read bravely to protect your mind. Since the second Iraq war, American media has become overtly pro-war, so if you're not really paying attention, you only get one side of the story. If you want to balance that out, I recommend the following sources:
Jeffrey Sachs, Professor at Columbia University. Sachs has extensive experience as an advisor to American and European leaders during the 1990s. He was sidelined by neoconservatives rooting for war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Sachs
John Mearsheimer, Professor at the University of Chicago. Mearsheimer famously predicted the present Ukraine war and authored "The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent" in a piece published in Foreign Affairs in 1993. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mearsheimer
The Making of the Atomic Bomb, by Richard Rhodes. He won the Pulitzer Prize for this book when it was published in 1986. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Making_of_the_Atomic_Bomb
Blood and Ruins: The Last Imperial War, 1931–1945 by Richard Overy. His work is summarized well in this review recently published in The Atlantic: https://archive.is/BZ2OO
