
I know this isn't the place to chime in with a conversation
about economics, but when has that stopped me before?
I read Mokyr's book, A Culture of Growth
[[ https://search.worldcat.org/title/964805224 ]] a couple years
ago and enjoyed it. I had a few nits about the content, but
then again, I'm not a Nobel Prize winning economist, so maybe I
should keep my mouth shut about that. If you're interested in
either history or economics, you should put it on the list of
books to consider reading. If you're interested in both, you
probably should read it.
But... I can also recommend von Hipple's Innovation series:
[[ https://evhippel.mit.edu/books/ ]].
And for the beginnings of a contrasting view to the "yeehaa!
growth!" mindset from the timeframe covered by Mokyr's book, I
would recommend Schumacher's "Small is Beautiful."
[[ https://search.worldcat.org/title/1239792692 ]] To be honest,
except for two chapters, I found the writing a little
uninspired. But it's worth a read as it introduces concepts you
hear from "post industrial" types (thinking of the Slow Food and
Slow Money movements.) I have a to-do item to write a book
about the "Slow Code" movement, but the industry probably
doesn't need help with that.
I haven't read Aghion's Endogenous Growth Theory
[[ https://search.worldcat.org/title/1027693933 ]], but worldcat
tells me it's at my local academic library, so I may have to
give it a go.Going beyond the Age of Discovery to why it was the West that industrialised ~1800, rather than other places and times, has occupied a great many writers. Karl Polnyi's The Great Transformation, a whole set of economic history texts edited by Joel Mokyr (the Princeton Economic History of the World), notably Pomeranz, The Great Divergence, Clark's A Farewell to Alms, and Mokyr's on (not part of the series) Gifts of Athena, A Culture of Growth, The British Industrial Revolution, and Lever of Riches. The question of "why Europe and not China?" is literally The Needham Question, which occupied British sinologist Joseph Needham for his entire life (and beyond -- his Science and Civilisation in China is still being written, approaching 70 years since it began, and two decades after Needham's own death.
Much of the criticism of Diamond's work smells far more to me of academic jealousy over not respecting borders. Several of the broad-brush elements you describe simply aren't valid. Others are details of larger theory which may require revisiting, but don't invalidate the whole.
Again: I'd asked for specific criticisms, preferably references to the best specific critiques available. Most I've seen are, as yours, vague, broad, and themselves grossly flawed.
Or for another view, Barbara King at NPR:
https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2013/01/14/169374400/why-d...
http://www.worldcat.org/title/techno-fix-why-technology-wont...
Joel Mokyr also looks into this problem in his new book The Culture of Growth:
http://www.worldcat.org/title/culture-of-growth-the-origins-...