
As the title suggests, this technique employs visual elements in its exploration of the most graphic and least "forbidding" aspects of mathematics. The author observes that most people possess a direct vision that permits them to "see" only the smaller numbers. In addressing this difficulty, both for those who like recreational mathematics and for those who teach, he suggests a variety of methods: techniques of visualizing, dramatizing, and analyzing numbers that attract and retain the attention and understanding. Topics range from basic multiplication and division to algebra, encompassing word problems, graphs, negative numbers, fractions, and many other practical applications of elementary mathematics. 1964 ed. Answers to Problems.
I think we don't cover basics like the distributive rule in school very well, and that it should be a much more nuts n bolts visual / measuring / counting experience.
Ive attempted to outline how I think this stuff should be taught, by making a video tour of the concepts - from Counting, to Distributive rule / algebra, to Quadratics then the Derivative, here :
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEInJ-Z4qBKYxbK1Mm13g...
All of these things are covered in some great books :
W W Sawyer Vision in Elementary Mathematics
Algebra by Gelfand
Calculus by Thomas
We have superb resources now like 3Blue1Brown, KhanAcademy and ArtOfProblemsolving.com / BeastAcademy .. so you _can_ get your kids a superb math education, even as many schools seemingly give up on teaching Algebra and Calculus.W. W. Sawyer's books, such as Mathematician's Delight[1] and Vision in Elementary Mathematics[2], seem to be exactly for this audience.
Where would we go to find a real-world example of mathematics being taught in the correct order to elementary-age pupils? There are many different schools (and many different settings for learning outside school) in many different countries. What is a good place to look for examples of demonstrably successful practice?
AFTER EDIT: Thanks for the reply. The thing I would want to look at in such intervention studies is how the teaching effectiveness is measured.
AFTER FURTHER EDIT: Oh, I see the video "Teaching Math Without Words, A Visual Approach to learning Math from MIND Research Institute" is one I have watched before, and have discussed among other mathematics teachers. Similarly, the publication Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School is a publication I subscribe to as a member of NCTM. I should start out in my reaction to both of these links you've kindly shared by pointing out that my own bent in thinking about mathematics is to think visually, and indeed that is why I like Sawyer's book Vision in Elementary Mathematics (which leads off my longer reply in this thread) so well.
But although I like visual approaches to teaching mathematics very well, and use them in the mathematics classes I teach, I also like studies of educational interventions to check results. So far, I can't find a publication by independent researchers (after searching Google Scholar and the new Microsoft Academic Search) that verifies the educational effectiveness claims made in the video for the proprietary intervention described there. The company's own website
http://www.mindresearch.net/cont/research/re_publications.ph...
provides only a very sparse set of links to published research on the issue.
Plainly, a more visual approach along the lines of the typical school textbooks used in Taiwan, Singapore, and Japan would be a better presentation of mathematics content than is found in typical United States textbooks. That should be possible to deliver without any computers at all, as it was delivered to pupils in Taiwan in my wife's generation, when Taiwan was still a poor, Third World country.
Books that I found helpful for understanding mathematics when my oldest son, a mathematics-lover, was growing up include
Concepts of Modern Mathematics by Ian Stewart (Dover reprint)
Numbers and Geometry by John Stillwell (Springer)
Vision in Elementary Mathematics by W. W. Sawyer (Dover reprint)
The Art of Problem Solving by Sandor Lehoczky and Richard Rusczyk (Art of Problem Solving)
A frequently recommended book for this need is Developing Math Talent by Susan Assouline and Ann Lupkowski-Shoplik, but I haven't made much use of that book.
What am I missing? What do you recommend?
http://www.amazon.com/Mapping-Music-Learning-Teachers-Studen...
which she has found very helpful.
As for mathematics, the subject I teach now, I have always cherished visual representations of mathematical concepts, for example those found in W. W. Sawyer's book Vision in Elementary Mathematics
http://www.amazon.com/Vision-Elementary-Mathematics-W-Sawyer...
http://www.marco-learningsystems.com/pages/sawyer/Vision_in_...
But other mathematicians who taught higher mathematics, for example Serge Lang, recommended memorizing some patterns of multiplying polynomials by oral recitation, just like reciting a poem.
http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Mathematics-Serge-Lang/dp/038796...
The acclaimed books on Calculus by Michael Spivak
http://www.amazon.com/Calculus-4th-Michael-Spivak/dp/0914098...
and Tom Apostol
http://www.amazon.com/Calculus-Vol-One-Variable-Introduction...
are acclaimed in large part because they use both well-chosen diagrams and meticulously rewritten words to deepen a student's acquaintance with calculus, related elementary calculus concepts to the more advanced concepts of real analysis.
Chinese-language textbooks about elementary mathematics for advanced learners, of which I have many at home, take care to introduce multiple representations of all mathematical concepts. The brilliant book Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States by Liping Ma
http://www.amazon.com/Knowing-Teaching-Elementary-Mathematic...
demonstrates with cogent examples just what a "profound understanding of fundamental mathematics" means, and how few American teachers have that understanding.
http://www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator/fall1999/amed1.pdf
http://www.ams.org/notices/199908/rev-howe.pdf
Elementary school teachers having a poor grasp of mathematics and thus not helping their pupils prepare for more advanced study of mathematics continues to be an ongoing problem in the United States.
http://www.ams.org/notices/200502/fea-kenschaft.pdf
In light of recent HN threads about Khan Academy,
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2348476
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2350430
I wonder what Khan Academy users who also have read the submitted blog post by Cal Newport think about how well students using Khan Academy as a learning tool can follow Newport's advice to gain insight into a subject. Is Khan Academy enough, or does it need to be supplemented with something else?
Here is one of my favorite quotations about mathematics teaching, used as my signature tagline on the first online forum where I used the screen name "tokenadult":
"The proper thing for a parent to say is, 'I did badly at mathematics, but I had a very bad teacher. I wish I had had a good one.'" W. W. Sawyer, Vision in Elementary Mathematics (1964), page 5.
Yes, the book from which the quotation comes is very good, and very good for learners with a visual learning style.
