Lies My Teacher Told Me
Since its first publication in 1995, Lies My Teacher Told Me has gone on to win an American Book Award, the Oliver Cromwell Cox Award for Distinguished Anti-Racist Scholarship, and to sell over half a million copies in its various editions. What started out as a survey of the twelve leading American history textbooks has ended up being what the San Francisco Chronicle calls "an extremely convincing plea for truth in education." In Lies My Teacher Told Me, James W. Loewen brings history alive in all its complexity and ambiguity. Beginning with pre-Columbian history and ranging over characters and events as diverse as Reconstruction, Helen Keller, the first Thanksgiving, and the Mai Lai massacre, Loewen offers an eye-opening critique of existing textbooks, and a wonderful retelling of American history as it should -- and could -- be taught to American students. - Publisher.
Stats for nerds
28recommend
52mentions
43people
2007–2026years
67% recommend33% neutral
Mentions per year
What Hacker News says
- I liked lies my teacher told me a lot. I always thought it’d be fun to generate a “get up to speed” pamphlet for every year in every school district depending on who was supplying the text books to the zip code + year you went to school, so you could find out what misinformation you carry with you (since so few people are in the business of retroactively fact checking what they were taught as kids)
- I don't mind (and dang, I hope you don't mind me responding to this post.) I think many people tend to reflexively downvote things that seem contrarian or contradict what they know, and that it's probably generally a good thing. Lies My Teacher Told Me gets into some of the issues with the way American history is taught, and even though we recognize that the cherry tree story is a fable now, people are generally taught a mythologized view of Washington and the other founders in school, and that's partly the basis for our civic religion. So when you come across a comment like I wrote, I think it's easy to dismiss it. And that's by design! Even back then, people knew they were consciously creating a myth surrounding Washington and other figures. Take this letter from Benjamin Rush to John Adams:
> The venerable Charles Thompson now above 80 years of Age, now and then calls to see me. I once suggested to him to write secret Memoirs of the American Revolution. “No—No said he I will not.—I could not tell the truth without giving great offence. Let the World admire our patriots and heroes. Their supposed talents and Virtues (where they were <[. . .])> so) <will> by commanding invitation will serve the Cause of patriotism, and of Our Country.” I concur in this Sentiment, and therefore I earnestly request that you will destroy this letter [largely about Washington's failings] as soon as you read it. I do not even wish it to be known that General W: was deficient in that Mark of true Greatness which so preeminently characterized Julius Cæsar, Henry the 4th: of France, and Frederick the 2nd: of Prussia,—the talent to forgive.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-5755
I think this is true of a lot of history, really - anything "important" we've assumed a mythologized view of, mediated by schools and Hollywood. Myth is more powerful than reality, so I think until you bury yourself in primary and contemporary sources, it can come across as almost conspiratorial. And of course, I am not saying that Rush, or the antifederalists, were correct in all their criticisms or all they said: only that Washington's comments must be understood contextually, and that's almost always missing when people refer to the Farewell Address, or at best they have a very simplified view of the situation that preserves the mythologization of Washington.
- "Lies My Teacher Told Me" by James Loewen
https://web.archive.org/web/20200329225058/http://sundown.to...
- The Atlantic is the mouthpiece of the imperial Borg, and the editor-in-chief got his position there by writing dishonest drivel in 2002 about Saddam's WMDs and Saddam's links to Al Qaeda in order to whip up popular support for the invasion of Iraq. Here's the damning evidence (note in particular the failure to discuss Saddam's deployment of chemical weapons against Iranian troops with the active support of Reagan and Thatcher):
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/03/25/the-great-terr...
As far as the Atlantic's take on the limits of acceptable literature at the high school level, it's not hard to understand if one can accept that their ideological grandfather was Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831). His idea that 'war is a continuation of politics by other means' leads to the conclustion that, in an authoritarian state, education would be a continuation of the state’s political ideology. and the fundamental rationale of education would be to serve the state’s objectives. Thus, the Atlantic supports teaching a version of history, politics, and culture that aims to create loyalty to the state and its leadership as the primary goal of high school level education. From this viewpoint, 'Lies My Teacher Told Me' by James Loewen is heretical blasphemy.
The alternative to rigid indoctination of students is to present them with multiple works with differing viewpoints and have them debate them on the merits - e.g. have them read Conrad's 'Heart of Darkness' as well as Chinua Achebe's 'Things Fall Apart' and let them come to their own conclusions. Also, stop excluding fantasy and science fiction literature from the academic curriculum! The Three-Body Problem is highly suitable for a high school literature course, for example.
The challenge in today's environment is convincing people in elite institutions that liberal authoritarian ideology and censorship - e.g. banning Conrad because they see him as an old white racist - is as much of a threat to a free and open society as conservative authoritarian ideology is.
- Not changed my mind (on what? "The holocaust is bad"?) but Night (and its sequel Day; I haven't read Dawn, which comes in the middle, yet) by Elie Wiesel. Horrifying, but important. Note that it's semi-fictionalized.
On truly changing the way I thought of something, I'd say some of Cory Doctorow's writing on Pluralistic, namely on if enshittification was a necessary consequence of the SEO spammers or a conscious choice by Google to increase.
Finally, Lies My Teacher Told Me. It's about how textbooks (in the US at least) misrepresent history, and how many of them still teach things effectively from the 50s. It's great. If you struggle with context and/or comprehending it (it's written fairly academically), he has a young readers edition (actually I'd recommend it anyway; it's good and young readers editions often provide more context than the 'adult' versions)
- I was lucky enough to go to a charter school where my teachers encouraged me to read books like "People's History of the U.S" and "Lies My Teacher Told Me". They have an agenda too, but understanding that there's a whole world of disagreement out there and that I should seek out multiple information sources and triangulate between them has been a huge superpower since. It's pretty shocking to understand the history of public education and realize that it wasn't created to benefit the student, but to benefit the future employers of those students.
