Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Floyd Toole - Sound reproduction – art and science/opinions and facts

    CIRMMT

    4 HN recommenders · recommended in 6 months, 2019–2026

    YouTube

    1:13:57 · 144K views · May 14, 2015

    Floyd Toole's CIRMMT distinguished lecture on the science of sound reproduction, drawing on decades of blind listening research. It covers what listeners prefer in loudspeakers and why measured accuracy and anechoic response matter.

    HN recommends it as a crash course on audio reproduction science, especially the finding that listeners reliably prefer more accurate speakers in blind tests.

    Hardware & ElectronicsAudio & video engineeringUniversity lectures & courses
    1. 23:53
      D/A and A/D | Digital Show and Tell (Monty Montgomery @ xiph.org)FL Studio647K views • 13 years ago
    2. 28:03
      AT&T Archives: Similiarities of Wave Behavior (Bonus Edition)AT&T Tech Channel474K views • 14 years ago
    3. 56:12
      Intro to Synthesis Part 1 - The Building Blocks of Sound & Synthesismatrixsynth712K views • 14 years ago
    4. 52:11
      string theory lied to us and now science communication is hardAngela Collier 1.5M views • 3 years ago
    5. 5:53
      CYMATICS: Science Vs. Music - Nigel StanfordNigel John Stanford55M views • 11 years ago
    6. 1:45:38
      The Unanswered Question 1973 1 Musical Phonology Bernstein Nortoncagin742K views • 12 years ago
    7. 1:54
      The Loudness WarMatt Mayfield Music2.7M views • 20 years ago
    8. 38:01
      I published music on Tidal to test MQA - MQA ReviewGoldenSound610K views • 5 years ago
    9. 2:41
      Speaking Piano - Now with (somewhat decent) captions!TheMcphearson2.2M views • 17 years ago
    10. 4:32
      The Visual Microphone: Passive Recovery of Sound from VideoAbe Davis's Research1.9M views • 12 years ago
    11. 1:16:21
      Notation Must Die: The Battle For How We Read MusicTantacrul1.8M views • 3 years ago
    12. 22:02
      ORCA Sequencer Intro (Experimental Livecoding!)Allieway Audio93K views • 7 years ago
    13. 11:54
      Tested: Where Does The Tone Come From In An Electric Guitar?Jim Lill2.9M views • 4 years ago
    14. 0:29
      Dial Up Modem Handshake Sound - SpectrogramBitcore3.7M views • 13 years ago
    15. 22:49
      I bought 1000 meters of wire to settle a physics debateAlphaPhoenix3.7M views • 4 years ago
    16. 14:48
      Sonification & The Problem with Making Music from DataTantacrul259K views • 9 years ago
    17. 54:13:03
      Larynx Demosynesthesiam14K views • 5 years ago
    18. 39:21
      Functional Composition - Chris FordClojureTV31K views • 13 years ago
    19. 52:56
      World's Second Best Speakers!Tech Ingredients2.5M views • 7 years ago
    20. 4:12
      Bytebeat: Experimental music from very short C programsVille-Matias Heikkilä (viznut)222K views • 15 years ago

    6 comments from Hacker News

    1. @Humbly8967Nov 2023· in “Speaker Support in Asahi Linux”

      This is actually a common misconception. In blind testing, the average listener reliably prefers the more accurate speaker. There is a talk [1] by Dr. Floyd Toole that is an excellent crash course on the science of sound reproduction and listener preference. [1] this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @lioetersMar 2021· in “Audio – Science in the Service of Art [pdf]”

      It's an article written by Floyd E. Toole, Ph.D., who was Vice President - Acoustical Engineering at Harman International from 1991 until he retired in 2007. "His research focused primarily on the acoustics and psychoacoustics of sound reproduction. Most notably, he established methods for subjective and objective evaluations which have been used to clarify the relationships between technical measurements of loudspeakers and listeners’ perceptions." From [LINK] > ...there really is such a thing as being "good enough for rock and roll". Here's a lecture by the same author, given at CIRMMT Distinguished Lectures in the Science and Technology of Music. this video - Floyd Toole - Sound reproduction – art and science/opinions and facts

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @1kGarandJun 2019· in “DIY Amps: A Roadmap for Beginners (2017)”

      False. Rigorous double blind a/b/c/d tests using real listeners has been performed, and the research has been published in peer reviewed journals since the 80's. What has happened is that most of the audiophile community saw research as a threat to their revenue streams and actively FUD around it. And the audio engineering community has simply moved on. Here is a talk that could be very informative. this video His book is worth a read as well.

      RecommendsView on HN
    4. @Humbly8967Oct 2025· in “EQ: A video about all forms of equalizers”

      EQing for a flat in room response is NOT ideal! Correcting a speaker requires measuring the *anechoic* response, and only the bass should be tuned to subtract the room's effect. This video [1] provides a crash course on science of audio reproduction. [1] this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    5. @Humbly8967Apr 2025· in “GPD Pocket 4 Speaker DSP: Configuring PipeWire so laptop speakers sound better”

      FYI, when attempting to apply this to speakers, the anechoic frequency response is required. If you try to equalize for flat-in-room response, the results are terrible. See this video[1] for loads more information and context. [1] this video

      RecommendsView on HN