Intel - Anti-Competitive, Anti-Consumer, Anti-Technology.

6 comments from Hacker News

1. @robertelderJul 2017· in “Samsung ends Intel's 2-decade-plus reign in microchips”

   I watched this video yesterday, and it seems to explain a lot about how Intel has been less focused on building better technology in the last 10-15 years: this video I'm not sure how balanced the viewpoint in the video is, but the author comes up with a lot of references.

   RecommendsView on HN
2. @snvzzApr 2018· in “AMD's Stock Price Jumps on News of Earnings Spurred by Ryzen”

   I'm not sure what you mean. From the time AMD released the K7 'Athlon' CPU, until the time Intel released Core2, AMD was king of performance. That's a long spawn of time. To understand why Intel kept selling CPUs like pancakes despite this, check this out: this video

   RecommendsView on HN
3. @TheDongIsYouSep 2017· in “The Huge Premium Intel Is Charging for Skylake Xeons”

   This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years: this video

   RecommendsView on HN
4. @mkhalilMay 2018· in “Intel Announces Optane DIMMs”

   I assume you mean Linus from YouTubes "Linus Tech Tips", and not Linus Torvalds. Surprised you wouldn't clarify that considering what website this is. Considering Intel's history, I wouldn't bet they direct their efforts based on a YouTube reviewer. Also, considering Intels very anti-competitive behavior (e.g [0], [1], [2]), I am wary of stating Intel entering the DDR industry will make it any less corrupt. [0]: [LINK] [1]: [LINK] [2]: this video

   CitesView on HN
5. @snvzzJun 2019· in “AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is the fastest processor on Geekbench”

   >AMD failed to capture the market despite making tremendous gains and legitimizing itself. Because Intel played dirty and illegal[0]. [0]: this video

   CitesView on HN