Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Raytheon’s High-Power Microwave Weapon Downs Drones

    AviationWeek

    3 HN mentions · mentioned in 3 months, 2019–2021

    YouTube

    2:03 · 230K views · Nov 11, 2016

    Cleared Defense Department footage of Raytheon's Phaser high-power microwave weapon bringing down drones during a 2013 live-fire demonstration at Fort Sill. Raytheon says it has halved the payload size and is offering the system for operational use.

    HN cites it as evidence that microwave and electromagnetic weapons against drones are real and already tested.

    Politics, History & SocietyMilitary history & warfareRobotics
    1. 29:28
      Defeating Microwave Weapons! - Part 1Tech Ingredients2.4M views • 4 years ago
    2. 2:07
      Rheinmetall Air Defence – Skynex truck-mounted engaging drone swarmRheinmetall – Der integrierte Technologiekonzern 5.7M views • 4 years ago
    3. 7:48
      SlaughterbotsStop Autonomous Weapons3.9M views • 8 years ago
    4. 7:48
      MICRO DRONES KILLER ARMS ROBOTS - AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - WARNING !!CS Consulting2.3M views • 8 years ago
    5. 15:14
      The most deadly project on the Internetbigclivedotcom6.8M views • 4 years ago
    6. 11:46
      Firing the Lorentz Plasma CannonLightningOnDemand7.9M views • 1 year ago
    7. 12:09
      I promise this story about microwaves is interesting.Tom Scott9M views • 5 years ago
    8. 13:21
      Daniel Suarez: The kill decision shouldn't belong to a robotTED78K views • 13 years ago
    9. 1:36
      Missile defense multiple kill vehicle hover testtheworacle1.7M views • 17 years ago
    10. 1:02
      Rheinmetall Air Defence: Ahead - Highly effective, programmable ammunitionRheinmetall – Der integrierte Technologiekonzern 17M views • 6 years ago
    11. 7:59
      Sci-Fi Short Film “Slaughterbots” | DUSTDUST2.2M views • 7 years ago
    12. 47:12
      Putin's new Russian MHD weapons explained (1st part)Jean-Pierre PETIT34K views • 8 years ago
    13. 15:22
      Nuclear Weapons: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)LastWeekTonight22M views • 12 years ago
    14. 28:11
      The Future of War, and How It Affects YOU (Multi-Domain Operations) - Smarter Every Day 211SmarterEveryDay2.6M views • 7 years ago
    15. 1:11:40
      MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach HartwigMIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center122K views • 9 years ago
    16. 2:40
      Phalanx CIWS Close-in Weapon System In Action - US Navy's Deadly AutocannonAiirSource Military16M views • 11 years ago
    17. 1:32:38
      Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)GoogleTalksArchive23K views • 14 years ago
    18. 1:27
      Aggressive Maneuvers for Autonomous Quadrotor FlightTheDmel2.6M views • 16 years ago
    19. 2:54
      Explained: New Navy UFO VideosMick West284K views • 6 years ago
    20. 21:25
      Gimbal UFO - A New AnalysisMick West208K views • 4 years ago

    3 comments from Hacker News

    1. @PaulHouleJul 2019· in “How big a threat is an electromagnetic attack?”

      Non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators are a real weapon that I think is more significant than the nuclear EMP that people are afraid of. Here is one example: this video Many amateurs have demonstrated disruption or destruction of electronic devices at short range with magnetron tubes from microwave ovens. I think those military prototypes use travelling wave tubes, they could probably be made more compact and efficient with gallium nitride transistors. The big avantage for anti-drone use is that the energy costs pennies per shot as compared to scaled down AA weapons such as Iron Dome that are more like $50,000 a shot. That same kind of device could wreck electronics at ground targets too, probably even be mounted on a plane. Note also that the nuclear electromagnetic pulse is produced by a plasma explosion, that is, if you have an explosion where the temperature is high enough to ionize the gas, the electrons will leave the scene of the explosion faster than the ions, so you will get a temporary charge separation that produces a pulse. The same thing can happen when a fast pulse laser hits a target and ablates the surface, or when a meteorite hits a satellite in space. The effect is much weaker, but it is at point-blank range and might be the dominant kill mechanism in those situations. (Note that antipersonnel laser weapons that use a fast pulse won't "burn a hole" in the target but instead cause a flash-bang like effect where EMP contributes to localized pain and discom

      CitesView on HN
    2. @sixstringtheoryFeb 2019· in “Scientists call for ban on lethal, autonomous robots”

      This brings to mind a microwave beam developed by Raygheon to down drones [0] and an article I read well over a decade ago about EMPs. Wonder how these are doing on the consumer front? [0] this video

      CitesView on HN
    3. @greedoJun 2021· in “To protect against weaponized drones, we must understand their key strengths”

      Jamming would address inter-swarm communications, but then they'd revert to solo operations. EMP isn't realistic, but microwave systems have already been tested: this video

      CitesView on HN