Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Red Bead Experiment with Dr. W. Edwards Deming

    The Deming Institute

    1 HN recommender · recommended in 5 months, 2016–2025

    YouTube

    9:01 · 231K views · Feb 25, 2014

    Excerpts from W. Edwards Deming's Red Bead Experiment, where workers draw beads from a bowl and are judged on red ones that are largely down to chance. It shows how system variation, not individual effort, drives results.

    HN cites it as a classic illustration of dysfunctional management, gamed targets, and blaming workers for systemic outcomes.

    Business, Startups & EconomicsManagement, leadership & organizationsData science & statistics
    1. 18:37
      The puzzle of motivation | Dan Pink | TEDTED13M views • 17 years ago
    2. 10:48
      RSA ANIMATE: Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates usRoyal Society of Arts20M views • 16 years ago
    3. 12:04
      Why Being Delusional is a SuperpowerVeritasium15M views • 6 years ago
    4. 9:36
      Dance p 3 Mar09Geoff Cumming83K views • 17 years ago
    5. 12:19
      If Russ Ackoff had given a TED Talk...Steven Brant306K views • 16 years ago
    6. 1:02:51
      Unconscious Bias @ Work | Google VenturesGV (Google Ventures)393K views • 12 years ago
    7. 27:29
      Software Engineering's Greatest HitsGreg Wilson25K views • 5 years ago
    8. 1:03:07
      Clutching at Random Straws, Matt Parker | LMS Popular Lectures 2010London Mathematical Society601K views • 12 years ago
    9. 7:38
      How We’re Fooled By StatisticsVeritasium3.8M views • 12 years ago
    10. 21:14
      The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule3Blue1Brown1.4M views • 5 years ago
    11. 27:19
      Once you understand game theory, you understand the world.Veritasium27M views • 2 years ago
    12. 11:48
      John Rauser keynote: "Statistics Without the Agonizing Pain" -- Strata + Hadoop 2014O'Reilly61K views • 12 years ago
    13. 11:25
      A visual guide to Bayesian thinkingJulia Galef2.2M views • 11 years ago
    14. 20:36
      Hans Rosling: Debunking third-world myths with the best stats you've ever seenTED2.2M views • 19 years ago
    15. 39:47
      How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy ExplainedStand-up Maths8.4M views • 5 years ago
    16. 17:59
      The Expert MythVeritasium16M views • 4 years ago
    17. 1:03:55
      🚀 TDD, Where Did It All Go Wrong (Ian Cooper)DevTernity Conference619K views • 8 years ago
    18. 12:22
      Is Most Published Research Wrong?Veritasium6.2M views • 10 years ago
    19. 54:47
      Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread | Sandy Pentland | Talks at GoogleTalks at Google53K views • 12 years ago
    20. 19:10
      Velocity NY 2013: Richard Cook, "Resilience In Complex Adaptive Systems"O'Reilly47K views • 13 years ago

    5 comments from Hacker News

    1. @jdietrichJan 2016· in “Why Is Your Team Falling Behind? Ask ‘The Penny Game’”

      A similar example regarding quality is Dr Deming's famous Red Bead Experiment. It is a fascinating insight into how dysfunctional management systems operate and perpetuate. this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    2. @dalyJun 2018· in “Ask HN: How to not fail on coding interview questions?”

      Send your architect home to build a rocking chair over his weekend. See if he calls you back on Monday. A take home test is a very clear statement by management that your time is less important than their process. As a professional, you only have your time and skill as your saleable assets. You have the choice of giving them away for free. You could, of course, take the test and then present them a bill for your services. Another interesting question to ask would be: "How many of your senior management were hired as programmers who passed a whiteboard test or a take home test?" Clearly, according to the market myth, those who did pass were "the best and the brightest". It only stands to reason that upper management is composed of programmers. Ball-pits are in plain sight, if you choose to see. Ball-pit companies who whiteboard and use take home tests are also in plain sight, if you choose to see beyond the "best and brightest" market hype. I really respected a Lisp legendary programmer, Daniel Weinreb. He worked at ITA software on airline reservation software. We had many discussions. I'd love to have worked with him. But ITA has the same testing game and I couldn't convince myself to bother. I'm certain I could pass their tests. I've been programming in Lisp since the 1970s. And ITA was a 5-star restaurant kind of company. But those tests are a "Clown-Nose" warning to me. I just walked away. Walking away has a cost. But so does management games like quarterly status reviews,

      CitesView on HN
    3. @dalyJul 2017· in “Uncle Bob Explains the Programmer's Oath (Videos)”

      Number 8, software estimates are complete nonsense. Read [LINK] I worked at a startup. Just before I was hired they bid on a fixed-cost 5 programmer, 5 month contract. After 10 programmers for 18 months they fired all of the (over 2 dozen) programmers and the company folded. At another startup I was given a project when the prior programmer left after 2 weeks. The project estimate was 8 weeks. I did an analysis (140 items, 4 of which had been completed) and estimated that the project would, at minimum, take over 6 months. The next day I was fired. IBM used to put out contract bids at 3 firms to build the frames for their mainframe computers. The independent bid estimates were delivered with time estimates within a day and costs with a penny. They delivered on time and on cost every time. Moral: If you have a repeatable task then you can provide an estimate. If you are doing a task for the first time, as most programmers are, then you CANNOT make a reasonable estimate. You can't even make a good guess. The only HONEST answer is "I don't know". Bob suggests providing 3 answers, minimum, likely, and maximum (aka NASA PERT charts). I tried that. The ONLY one management every hears is the minimum. They provide that number to the customer and record that as your target. Look at Edward Demming's work. Demming came up with principles that transformed Japan. Programming needs an Edward Demming. In fact, your job depends on your performance even on things you cannot control like estima

      CitesView on HN
    4. @ericalexander0Jan 2022· in “The Rise of Performative Work”

      Given enough time. Yes, your surgeon has this attitude. Any system with a grade will be gamified to hit arbitrary targets. Even if those targets do not map back to customer value. Even if the targets are out of their control. Aka red beads. this video “Tell me how you will measure me, and then I will tell you how I will behave. If you measure me in an illogical way, don’t complain about illogical behavior.” – Eli Goldratt

      CitesView on HN
    5. @GarnetFlorideSep 2025· in “If you are good at code review, you will be good at using AI agents”

      Oh man, that's what I've been smelling with all this. It's the Red Bead Experiment, all over again. this video

      CitesView on HN