Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Tom Lehrer - Wernher von Braun - with intro

    The Tom Lehrer Wisdom Channel

    1 HN recommender · recommended in 10 months, 2014–2024

    YouTube

    2:16 · 1.2M views · Jul 11, 2009

    Tom Lehrer performs his satirical song about rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, with an introduction, in a short clip posted for the Apollo 11 anniversary. It lampoons von Braun's moral flexibility.

    HN brings it up as the sharpest satire of scientists who serve whoever pays them, and as a favorite Lehrer song.

    Arts, Comedy, Music & FilmMusic performance & songsSatire & parodySpace exploration & spaceflight
    1. 1:40
      Daniel Radcliffe sings "The Elements" - The Graham Norton Show - Series 8 Episode 4 - BBCBBC9.2M views • 15 years ago
    2. 2:37
      Tom Lehrer - Who's Next - with introThe Tom Lehrer Wisdom Channel1.4M views • 18 years ago
    3. 3:27
      Tom Lehrer - We Will All Go Together When We GoThe Tom Lehrer Wisdom Channel5M views • 18 years ago
    4. 5:14
      Tom Lehrer - National Brotherhood Week - with introThe Tom Lehrer Wisdom Channel694K views • 18 years ago
    5. 4:23
      Tom Lehrer - New Math (Animated)Jared Khan2.4M views • 16 years ago
    6. 50:43
      Tom Lehrer Full Copenhagen PerformanceTom Lehrer1.1M views • 13 years ago
    7. 3:03
      Tom Lehrer - The Elements - LIVE FILM From Copenhagen in 1967The Tom Lehrer Wisdom Channel2.4M views • 14 years ago
    8. 2:17
      Tom Lehrer - Poisoning Pigeons In The ParkThe Tom Lehrer Wisdom Channel5.7M views • 19 years ago
    9. 5:20
      Neil deGrasse Tyson - We Stopped Dreaming (Episode 1)Evan Schurr2.4M views • 14 years ago
    10. 3:59
      Public Service Broadcasting - Go!PSBHQVEVO3.2M views • 11 years ago
    11. 2:45
      Welcome to Life: the singularity, ruined by lawyersTom Scott3.7M views • 14 years ago
    12. 4:41
      Welcome to the Internet - Bo Burnham (from "Inside" -- ALBUM OUT NOW)boburnham174M views • 5 years ago
    13. 6:48
      Complete History Of The Soviet Union, Arranged To The Melody Of Tetrispigwiththefaceofaboy15M views • 16 years ago
    14. 3:21
      Nanobot (Havana Parody) | A Capella Science ft. Dorothy Andrusiakacapellascience1.5M views • 8 years ago
    15. 2:01
      Rockwell Retro Encabulatorrlcarnes7.5M views • 18 years ago
    16. 1:50
      "Turbo Encabulator" the OriginalDave Rondot3.5M views • 16 years ago
    17. 2:46
      Here Comes Another Bubble v1.1 - The Richter ScalesTheRichterScales1.2M views • 18 years ago
    18. 27:15
      The Fake Futurism of Elon MuskTom Nicholas1.8M views • 6 years ago
    19. 3:37
      Using Social Media To Cover For Lack Of Original Thought - Onion Talks - Ep. 6The Onion1.5M views • 13 years ago
    20. 3:50
      Hitler uses Dockernukemtube1.2M views • 10 years ago

    10 comments from Hacker News

    1. @sriram_malharDec 2022· in “Tom Lehrer has released all of his songs into the public domain”

      My favourite is Wernher Von Braun. this video Thank you Tom Lehrer for all the memories and the laughs, and a biting satire that's still fresh.

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @cjslepMar 2020· in “Pleroma 2.0: a free, federated social networking server built on open protocols”

      And we've come full circle: your argument here is exactly the same as here: [LINK] I am happy to let you keep showing off your circular reasoning to the world, and will happily repeat myself pointing out all my counterpoints you did not engage with and ignored. For example: - I claimed a technology's existence is enough to cause real world consequences. You ignored this point. - I mentioned you are not including safeties to building a tool to protect its user[0] (the "first party" user of your tool) and its targets ("second party" people the tool-users are subjecting to your tool). That makes it legally/morally unappealing to use as a tool (puts self in danger), and morally unappealing to be subjected to. Why build a tool this way to be completely legally/morally unappealing, unless you want to cater to users specifically that do not have such legal/ethical concerns? You ignored this point. - I have invited you to clarify your ethical view. You are circling back to a previous non-argument. - You simply refuse to verbalize your implicit moral stance -- that your role as a "toolmaker" absolves you of all the moral consequences of its use[1]. If this is incorrect, I welcome clarification from you. [0] The laundry list of features of other scrapers I mentioned, here: [LINK] [1] This moral position has long been well-criticized and is not a sufficiently nuanced moral stance in this day and age. For an old example, consider Tom Lehrer's criticism of von Braun: "'Once the rockets ar

      CitesView on HN
    3. @ferDec 2021· in “The Last Soviet Generation”

      Hard to tell, but it was consistently losing to the Soviet Union by most space-dick measurement metrics. Please don't see me as defending the USSR in any way, it's a widely accepted fact that the USSR was 0.5-2 years ahead in most milestones. My comment was more in line to contradict the statement of "this country invented everything!" when obviously the Soviets had a strong know how that certainly didn't come from the US [0]. The man on the moon is what it is: an incredibly impressive feat with an objectively terrible risk/benefit ratio, but pulling it off makes it great for propaganda purposes. Once the US did that, the crewed moon landing programs in the USSR, which already had problems, were instantaneously de-funded, as the value of being the first was gone. It's not casual that since the space race ended, rational thinking kicked in and 100% of surface exploration and analysis has been done with unmanned rovers and sample return missions. And in my opinion, unmanned missions are more impressive from a technical standpoint, but that's another topic. This is an article on the subject that covers well the main reason why the USSR failed at what they seemed to be winning. [1] [0] this video [1] [LINK]

      CitesView on HN
    4. @PhasmaFelisApr 2016· in “Cisco’s Attempt to Dodge Responsibility for Facilitating Human Rights Abuses”

      I didn't intend to imply that he did, apologies. I realize my original post was poorly phrased, so I edited out that part. It's the people saying either that Cisco couldn't have possibly known what China would do with tech designed specifically to track a suppressed religious group, or else doing the Werner von Braun defense[1], that I'm referring to. [1] "'Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department,' says Werner von Braun." this video

      CitesView on HN
    5. @otrasDec 2018· in “Project A119”

      Along these lines, I've always been fascinated by Operation Paperclip [0], the US effort to collect Nazi scientists that including Wernher von Braun (of V2 infamy and Saturn V fame). As Tom Lehrer sang [1], " 'Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department,' says Wernher von Braun. " [0]: [LINK] [1]: this video

      CitesView on HN