Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Math Magic

    Vsauce

    2 HN recommenders · recommended in 3 months, 2016–2024

    YouTube

    19:31 · 14M views · Feb 5, 2016

    Vsauce explores math through card tricks and big numbers, including an animation of how enormous 52 factorial, the number of deck orderings, really is.

    Cited for its well-known attempt to convey the size of 52 factorial.

    Mathematics & Theoretical CSRecreational & visual mathProbability & game theoryMagic, puzzles & curiosities
    1. 23:46
      How To Count Past InfinityVsauce30M views • 10 years ago
    2. 1:11:48
      Math Encounters -- Five Balls, Two Hands: The Patterns of Juggling -- Colin Wright (Presentation)National Museum of Mathematics33K views • 14 years ago
    3. 9:22
      The Best (and Worst) Ways to Shuffle Cards - NumberphileNumberphile2.3M views • 11 years ago
    4. 57:03
      HACKENBUSH: a window to a new world of mathOwen Maitzen562K views • 5 years ago
    5. 8:00
      Infinity is bigger than you think - NumberphileNumberphile7.7M views • 14 years ago
    6. 13:31
      Randomness is Random - NumberphileNumberphile893K views • 7 years ago
    7. 22:54
      I Built a COMPUTER in Magic: The GatheringBecause Science2M views • 7 years ago
    8. 24:14
      The Banach–Tarski ParadoxVsauce49M views • 11 years ago
    9. 7:42
      Extremely Large Numbers 1 - IntroductionGiroux Studios20K views • 11 years ago
    10. 32:32
      The Strange Math That Predicts (Almost) AnythingVeritasium13M views • 1 year ago
    11. 11:48
      Will We Ever Run Out of New Music?Vsauce17M views • 13 years ago
    12. 14:27
      A simple trick to design your own solutions for Rubik's cubesMathologer1.6M views • 10 years ago
    13. 39:47
      How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy ExplainedStand-up Maths8.4M views • 5 years ago
    14. 12:25
      Fantastic Quaternions - NumberphileNumberphile1.1M views • 10 years ago
    15. 32:11
      Darts in Higher Dimensions (with 3blue1brown) - NumberphileNumberphile2.2M views • 6 years ago
    16. 10:33
      Strange Spheres in Higher Dimensions - NumberphileNumberphile768K views • 9 years ago
    17. 7:56
      Pi and the Mandelbrot Set - NumberphileNumberphile881K views • 11 years ago
    18. 51:16
      Why can't you multiply vectors?Freya Holmér525K views • 3 years ago
    19. 13:37
      Times Tables, Mandelbrot and the Heart of MathematicsMathologer2.8M views • 10 years ago
    20. 15:08
      What does it feel like to invent math?3Blue1Brown4.6M views • 11 years ago

    3 comments from Hacker News

    1. @KortaggioJun 2016· in “To approximate 52! by hand, compute 54! and divide by 3000”

      Vsauce has a fantastic animation of this too: this video Deal yourself five cards every billion years. When you finally deal yourself a royal flush, buy a lottery ticket. If the ticket wins the lottery, throw a single grain of sand into the Grand Canyon. As soon as the Grand Canyon is completely full of sand, remove one ounce of rock from Mount Everest. By the time Mount Everest is level: take a look at the clock. You'll have to do the whole thing all over again 256 more times before your timer reaches zero.

      RecommendsView on HN
    2. @redundantlyDec 2024· in “Every V4 UUID”

      The number you're thinking of is 52! (52 factorial) and how long it would take for 52! seconds to pass by. Vsauce has a great video on this, and might be where that example was taken from. this video That example starts 16 minutes into the video: this video But it's worth watching the whole thing.

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @danbrucNov 2023· in “The 8000th Busy Beaver number eludes ZF set theory (2016)”

      A commonly quoted number for the number of particles in the observable universe is 10^80 give or take a few orders of magnitude an they have very roughly 10^10^10^2 permutations if you consider all particles distinguishable. The best known lower bound for BB(6, 2) seems to be 10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10 which is more like the number of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of permutations of the particles in the universe. Trying to comprehend or compare the size of BB(745) is just futile. Here [1] is a well known attempt to convey the size of 52!, the number of permutations of a deck of cards. [1] this video

      CitesView on HN