Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    The Mathematics of Quantum Computers | Infinite Series

    PBS Infinite Series

    4 HN recommenders · recommended in 5 months, 2017–2023

    YouTube

    12:35 · 718K views · Feb 16, 2017

    A PBS Infinite Series episode explaining the mathematics of quantum computers, including how qubits store complex numbers and how quantum computation differs from classical computation. Hosted by Kelsey Houston-Edwards.

    HN recommends it as one of the most accessible yet accurate introductions to quantum computing, and part of a wider series that covers Shor's algorithm.

    Mathematics & Theoretical CSQuantum computingRecreational & visual math
    1. 16:36
      Hacking at Quantum Speed with Shor's Algorithm | Infinite SeriesPBS Infinite Series238K views • 9 years ago
    2. 1:28:23
      Quantum Computing for Computer ScientistsMicrosoft Research2.2M views • 8 years ago
    3. 17:31
      How Quantum Computers Break Encryption | Shor's Algorithm Explainedminutephysics3.4M views • 7 years ago
    4. 19:27
      Quantum Computing Expert Explains One Concept in 5 Levels of Difficulty | WIREDWIRED8M views • 8 years ago
    5. 31:18
      Quantum Expert Insight: Peter ShorQiskit607K views • 5 years ago
    6. 5:47
      Imaginary Numbers Are Real [Part 1: Introduction]Welch Labs8.6M views • 11 years ago
    7. 17:35
      Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradoxminutephysics8.1M views • 9 years ago
    8. 42:43
      "Propositions as Types" by Philip WadlerStrange Loop Conference144K views • 11 years ago
    9. 34:25
      Ramanujan: Making sense of 1+2+3+... = -1/12 and Co.Mathologer3.6M views • 10 years ago
    10. 10:44
      P vs. NP and the Computational Complexity Zoohackerdashery3.7M views • 12 years ago
    11. 14:40
      How the Quantum Eraser Rewrites the Past | Space Time | PBS Digital StudiosPBS Space Time2.9M views • 10 years ago
    12. 13:43
      Why Quantum Information is Never DestroyedPBS Space Time716K views • 8 years ago
    13. 1:00:43
      Jim Simons (full length interview) - NumberphileNumberphile21.4M views • 11 years ago
    14. 22:22
      Some light quantum mechanics (with minutephysics)3Blue1Brown2.2M views • 9 years ago
    15. 1:15:47
      Richard Feynman Computer Science Lecture - Hardware, Software and HeuristicsMuon Ray979K views • 14 years ago
    16. 11:26
      Do Complex Numbers Exist?Sabine Hossenfelder854K views • 5 years ago
    17. 17:05
      How Physicists Created a Holographic Wormhole in a Quantum ComputerQuanta Magazine2.4M views • 3 years ago
    18. 6:29
      Google and NASA's Quantum Artificial Intelligence LabGoogle11M views • 13 years ago
    19. 1:03:43
      The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to KnowGoogle TechTalks1.8M views • 15 years ago
    20. 57:03
      HACKENBUSH: a window to a new world of mathOwen Maitzen562K views • 5 years ago

    5 comments from Hacker News

    1. @supriyo-biswasApr 2023· in “Quantum Computing 101”

      The videos by Microsoft Research[1] and PBS[2] are perhaps the most accessible and yet accurate explanations of quantum computing I have found so far. [1] [LINK] [2] this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @msclrhdNov 2018· in “The Case Against Quantum Computing”

      It's not that they can execute a computation faster in the traditional sense. It is that you can exploit the quantum behaviour in some types of computation (e.g. factoring primes) to make the answer more probable, and thus more likely to be "observed", when you read the state of the quantum computer and thus make it easy to locate the correct answer compared to traditional algorithms. PBS Infinite Series has several videos on quantum computing and Shor's algorithm: 1. this video "The Mathematics of Quantum Computers" 2. [LINK] "How to Break Cryptography" 3. [LINK] "Hacking at Quantum Speed with Shor's Algorthm"

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @stcredzeroMay 2017· in “Fermi's Paradox [audio]”

      Issac Arthur has his stuff together. His videos are for the most part well researched and contain a lot of interesting hard sci-fi ideas. The only time I've seen him fall down is his video about quantum computing, but to be fair, a lot of people get caught by the same mistake. It's not the case that a quantum computer is trying out all of the bit-strings that are possible answers in a kind of quantum-superposed parallel computing. That's not exactly what is happening. One of the key insights: Qubits store complex numbers! this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    4. @adamisntdeadApr 2018· in “Qusim.py – A toy multi-qubit quantum computer simulator written in Python”

      You should check out these videos, one of them might give you an understanding! - [LINK] | Quantum Computers Explained - this video | The Mathematics of Quantum Computers - [LINK] | Hacking at Quantum Speed with Shor's Algorithm - [LINK] | A series by the author of the standard textbook These are videos I particularly like!

      RecommendsView on HN
    5. @stcredzeroFeb 2018· in “An Argument Against Quantum Computers”

      A note for the savvy: A quantum computer is not a magic bit-string that mysteriously flips to the correct answer. A n-qubit quantum computer is not like 2^n phantom computers running at the same time in some quantum superposition phantom-zone. That's the popular misconception, but it's effectively ignorant techno-woo. Here's what really happens. If you have a string of n-qubits, when you measure them, they might end up randomly in of of the 2^n possible configurations. However, if you apply some operations to your string of n-qubits using quantum gates, you can usefully bias their wave equations, such that the probabilities of certain configurations are much more likely to appear. (You can't have too many of these operations, however, as that runs the risk of decoherence .) Hopefully, you can do this in such a way, that the biased configurations are the answer to a problem you want to solve. So then, if you have a quantum computer in such a setup, you can run it a bunch of times, and if everything goes well after enough iterations, you will be able to notice a bias towards certain configurations of the string of bits. If you can do this often enough to get statistical significance, then you can be pretty confident you've found your answers. this video [LINK] EDIT: I rather like Issac Arthur, but unfortunately, his Quantum Computing episode is an example of exactly this kind of popular misconception. I've called him out on it in comments. [LINK] EDIT: I can't find my comment anym

      CitesView on HN