Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong

    Veritasium

    4 HN recommenders · recommended in 4 months, 2025–2026

    YouTube

    45:13 · 12M views · Nov 26, 2025

    Veritasium explains why many real-world systems follow power laws rather than normal distributions. It covers self-organized criticality, with simulations of sandpiles, magnetism and forest fires.

    HN commenters recommend it for changing how they think about distributions and for showing how criticality shows up across earthquakes, wildfires and other fields.

    Physics, Space & ChemistryEveryday physics & science demosData science & statisticsScientific method & science communication
    1. 12:04
      Why Being Delusional is a SuperpowerVeritasium15M views • 6 years ago
    2. 14:48
      The Biggest Misconception About ElectricityVeritasium28M views • 4 years ago
    3. 4:44
      The Most Common Cognitive BiasVeritasium17M views • 12 years ago
    4. 1:15:11
      Veritasium: What Everyone Gets Wrong About AI and Learning – Derek Muller ExplainsPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics5M views • 1 year ago
    5. 12:22
      Is Most Published Research Wrong?Veritasium6.2M views • 10 years ago
    6. 27:19
      Once you understand game theory, you understand the world.Veritasium27M views • 2 years ago
    7. 23:03
      The Universe is Hostile to ComputersVeritasium26M views • 5 years ago
    8. 10:37
      The Bayesian TrapVeritasium4.5M views • 9 years ago
    9. 34:29
      I took an IQ test to explain what's wrong with themVeritasium13M views • 3 years ago
    10. 21:38
      Risking My Life To Settle A Physics DebateVeritasium12M views • 5 years ago
    11. 14:27
      The Biggest Myth In EducationVeritasium16M views • 5 years ago
    12. 8:04
      Khan Academy and the Effectiveness of Science VideosVeritasium1.7M views • 15 years ago
    13. 17:34
      What Everyone Gets Wrong About GravityVeritasium16M views • 6 years ago
    14. 33:01
      The Strangest Implication of Quantum MechanicsVeritasium21M views • 1 year ago
    15. 19:29
      The Surprising Secret of SynchronizationVeritasium28M views • 5 years ago
    16. 9:16
      Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a DistanceVeritasium4.5M views • 11 years ago
    17. 18:39
      This equation will change how you see the world (the logistic map)Veritasium17M views • 6 years ago
    18. 19:17
      How Wrong Is VERITASIUM? A Lamp and Power Line StoryElectroBOOM4.4M views • 4 years ago
    19. 51:36
      Veritasium: A Story of YouTube PropagandaTom Nicholas2.7M views • 5 years ago
    20. 17:59
      The Expert MythVeritasium16M views • 4 years ago

    6 comments from Hacker News

    1. @gopalvAug 2026· in “Your Key to Success Isn't More Luck or Hard Work”

      Your success eV is opportunities x success-rate. Out of the gate, hard work improves success rates, but not the count of opportunities. Connections improve opportunities, it doesn't do shit for success-rate. Luck does for both sides of the mix. As a startup founder in my 40s, the entire VP/SVP level in silicon valley is people one or two hops away for an intro, though admittedly a lot of the first hop there is through the other founders. The original paper about importance of weak ties is under appreciated, because people you work with tend to go on to better & bigger things - especially in the beginning of your career, if you are a nice person. Veritasium put out a very nice video[1] about knowing which sort of game we're playing. It is a power law game. There are only two takeaways I had, "show up" and "get lucky". There is no winning without showing up. [1] - this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    2. @indigodaddyDec 2025· in “Strong earthquake hits northern Japan, tsunami warning issued”

      Various scientists in this video. The video is a great watch btw. this video (stresses build up and are often released through many small, unfelt earthquakes (25:54). If these small movements don't dissipate the stress, it can accumulate and lead to a powerful chain reaction (26:25) * disclaimer I used YouTube's built-in AI to find/summarize the timestamps, as I couldn't remember offhand where it was when I previously watched this.

      RecommendsView on HN
    3. @austy69Dec 2025· in “I'm just having fun”

      Glad you mentioned the veritasium video on these. Here is the link: this video Before I watched this I would default to thinking about most distributions as normal. It's really fun to think about whatever "game" you are playing - wether you are building a business or trying to win a carnival game - and consider if the results follow a normal distribution or a power law?

      RecommendsView on HN
    4. @kjshsh123Feb 2026· in “Five disciplines discovered the same math independently – none of them knew”

      3Blue1Brown has a good video on phase transitions. [LINK] Veritasium has a good video on how criticality applies to other things too, this video

      RecommendsView on HN
    5. @godelskiNov 2025· in “Ilya Sutskever, Yann LeCun and the End of “Just Add GPUs””

      > Won't scaling laws apply to it anyway? Yes, of course. Scaling Laws will always apply, but that's not really the point[0] The fight was never "Scale is all you need" (SIAYN) vs "scale is irrelevant" it was "SIAYN" vs "Scaling is not enough". I'm not aware of any halfway serious researcher that did not think scaling was going to result in massive improvements. Being a researcher from the SINE camp myself... Here's the thing: The SIAYN camp argued that the transformer architecture was essentially good enough. They didn't think scale was all you needed, but that the rest would me minor tweaks and increasing model size and data size would get us there. That those were the major hurdles. In this sense they argued that we should move our efforts away from research and into engineering. That AGI was now essentially a money problem rather than a research problem. They pointed to Sutton's Bitter Lesson narrowly, concentrating on his point about compute. The SINE (or SINAYN) camp wasn't sold. We read the Bitter Lesson differently. That yes, compute is a key element to modern success, but just as important was the rise of our flexible algorithms. In the past we couldn't work with such algorithms because of lack of computational power, but that the real power was the algorithms. We're definitely a more diverse camp too, with vary arguments. Many of us look at animals and see that we can do so much more with so much less[2]. Clearly even if SIAYN were sufficient, it does not appear to b

      CitesView on HN