Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Feynman on Scientific Method.

    seabala

    6 HN recommenders · recommended in 13 months, 2012–2024

    YouTube

    9:59 · 2.4M views · Feb 18, 2011

    A short clip of Richard Feynman explaining the scientific method: guess, compute consequences, compare to experiment, and why vague theories like astrology cannot be proven wrong.

    Widely recommended as one of the clearest, funniest short explanations of what makes something science.

    Ideas, Learning & LanguageScientific method & science communication
    1. 1:03
      The Scientific Method-Richard FeynmanSképseis180K views • 13 years ago
    2. 1:53
      Richard Feynman on PseudoscienceJacob Edward363K views • 10 years ago
    3. 1:52
      R. P. Feynman on social sciencesx1x2x3ct210K views • 16 years ago
    4. 7:33
      Feynman: Magnets FUN TO IMAGINE 4 But see NEW UPDATED file at https://tinyurl.com/ycphc432Christopher Sykes1.6M views • 17 years ago
    5. 7:35
      Feynman: Magnets (and Why?) FUN TO IMAGINE 4/ higher quality version!Christopher Sykes360K views • 8 years ago
    6. 7:33
      Richard Feynman Magnetsnebulajr1000K views • 17 years ago
    7. 2:49
      Feynman :: Rules of Chessdefjam99b1.4M views • 19 years ago
    8. 5:37
      Feynman: Knowing versus UnderstandingTehPhysicalist2.7M views • 14 years ago
    9. 1:06:50
      HD Feynman: FUN TO IMAGINE complete (with optional Chinese subtitles)Christopher Sykes713K views • 6 years ago
    10. 17:15
      David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanationTED245K views • 17 years ago
    11. 1:03:43
      The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to KnowGoogle TechTalks1.8M views • 15 years ago
    12. 1:06:50
      The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard FeynmanChristopher Sykes5.9M views • 8 years ago
    13. 7:33
      Richard Feynman. Why.firewalker5.5M views • 14 years ago
    14. 7:07
      Feynman: What things really are like FUN TO IMAGINE 1Christopher Sykes747K views • 17 years ago
    15. 9:47
      Feynman: Mathematicians versus PhysicistsTehPhysicalist882K views • 14 years ago
    16. 8:04
      Khan Academy and the Effectiveness of Science VideosVeritasium1.7M views • 15 years ago
    17. 1:40
      Richard Feynman: "What's the name of a bird?"Yves Messer48K views • 13 years ago
    18. 52:11
      string theory lied to us and now science communication is hardAngela Collier 1.5M views • 3 years ago
    19. 9:01
      Feynman: Take the world from another point of view (1/4)Aaron Scher1.5M views • 18 years ago
    20. 10:20
      Feynman: 'Greek' versus 'Babylonian' mathematicsTehPhysicalist377K views • 14 years ago

    15 comments from Hacker News

    1. @ddingusSep 2024· in “Is accidentally stumbling across the unknown a key part of science?”

      Yes! Nature is the authority. Our scientific method allows us to pose any question and it allows us to gain understanding when said questions are testable and repeatable. Notably: we never get to know anything, sadly But, we do understand monkey see, monkey do style: do A get B Observing nature is key, but not the only key. Observation coupled with mathematics allows us to process observation analytically, and all of that allows us to... Guess and test! Richard Feynman taught this at Cornell, and it remains one of the best explanations of the scientific method around because it is clear, funny and short, to the point: this video And just another thing to add here, and that is science is not a belief system, nor does it require belief due to the method requiring we question everything, including the method! Notably, Feynman talks about things being likely or unlikely as a root driver for our guesses, which again depend on observation, that stumbling into that which can enlighten, math needed to predict, and experiment to test. Theory is not proof either. It is simply the most predictive understanding we have! Old theory still works as well as it ever did, and that build down to how predictive it is. Is a theory proven right? Nope, we can only say we have yet to prove it wrong. Example: Einstein Theory of General Relativity has been very difficult to prove wrong and it has been very predictive even when we have not expected it to be! Is Einstein right? Who knows? What we can say i

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    2. @quasirandomMar 2021· in “Trust: The Need for Public Understanding of How Science Works”

      Feynman's lectures on the character of physical law should be something everyone sees in school. In general we look for a new law by the following process: first we guess it, then we compute the consequences of the guess... and then we compare those computation results to experiment. If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn't make a difference how beautiful your guess is. It doesn't make a difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is. If it disagrees with experiment its wrong, that's all there is to it. Notice however that we never prove it right... In the future there could be a wider range of experiments, or you could compute a wider range of consequences, and you may discover then that the thing is wrong. That's why laws like Newton's laws for the motions of planets last such a long time... It took several hundred years before the slight error in the motion of Mercury was developed. this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    3. @ddingusNov 2022· in “In what sense is quantum computing a science?”

      Science is about basic understanding. Monkey see, monkey do. Input A yields outcome B. We get that understanding this way: this video I love that whole series of lectures. They are his Cornell introduction to physics lectures and are a gold mine of basic scientific type thinking. So far, science has not increased our knowledge of truth. That's damn tough to come by. What it has done is very significantly expanded our understanding of the world. Our theories are far more predictive in far more contexts than ever! But, that is it! Monkey see, monkey do. Engineering is all about applying that understanding to solve problems in robust, efficient, safe ways.

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    4. @Kim_BruningApr 2024· in “I should have loved biology (2020)”

      this video < have an explanation by Feynman on the scientific method. (Feynman is a great teacher!) The whole video is pretty good, and the specific point starting with "You cannot prove a vague theory wrong" is explained around 5:10.

      Strongly recommendsView on HN
    5. @acscottSep 2016· in “Bad science persists because poor methods are rewarded”

      "Science" has now many definitions. My personal understanding of "science" is this: this video

      Strongly recommendsView on HN