Skip to content
HomeVideos
AllLongsCategoriesPlaylists
BooksBlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K

    Noam Chomsky to BBC-journalist: "If you believed different you wouldn't been sitting here."

    Verantwoordelijke Pers

    5 HN mentions · mentioned in 5 months, 2019–2023

    YouTube

    0:12 · 25K views · Jul 20, 2017

    A short excerpt of Noam Chomsky telling a BBC journalist that he does not accuse him of self-censorship. He argues that people who believed differently would not have been hired into that position.

    HN cites it as a well-known clip on how structural incentives and hiring shape media bias without conspiracy.

    Politics, History & SocietyMedia, journalism & propagandaFree speech, censorship & civil liberties
    1. 3:08
      Noam Chomsky Stumps Andrew MarrUnapproved Narratives275K views • 10 years ago
    2. 30:18
      Noam Chomsky on Propaganda - The Big Idea - Interview with Andrew Marrk1mk1mk1m293K views • 14 years ago
    3. 9:04
      Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing ConsentChomsky's Philosophy2.4M views • 11 years ago
    4. 4:47
      Noam Chomsky: The five filters of the mass media machine | The Listening PostAl Jazeera English2.9M views • 9 years ago
    5. 10:16
      Noam Chomsky - Freedom of Speech for Views You Don't LikeChomsky's Philosophy183K views • 9 years ago
    6. 56:36
      Noam Chomsky Thought Control In Democratic Societies NEW!Riccardo12K views • 11 years ago
    7. 2:01:00
      Noam Chomsky: "Free Markets?"Santarchy544K views • 15 years ago
    8. 1:00:10
      USA's Leading Dissident Voice | Noam Chomsky | Talks at GoogleTalks at Google500K views • 9 years ago
    9. 29:56
      Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernismChannel 4 News52M views • 8 years ago
    10. 17:26
      Don't Be a Sucker - 1947Weirdo Video1M views • 19 years ago
    11. 29:37
      The Really Dark Truth About BotsBenn Jordan950K views • 1 year ago
    12. 10:37
      Astroturf and manipulation of media messages | Sharyl Attkisson | TEDxUniversityofNevadaTEDx Talks1.5M views • 11 years ago
    13. 22:49
      Don't Be a SuckerUS National Archives2M views • 9 years ago
    14. 2:31
      David Carr vs. Some Guys from VICEAudenRaybourn383K views • 14 years ago
    15. 1:40:28
      Canceling | ContraPointsContraPoints6.3M views • 6 years ago
    16. 1:10:03
      Debate Noam Chomsky & Michel Foucault - On human nature [Subtitled]withDefiance2.7M views • 13 years ago
    17. 38:53
      Brainwash: The Gender Equality Paradoxhgoetkehgoetke176K views • 14 years ago
    18. 1:16:17
      In Search Of A Flat EarthFolding Ideas4.9M views • 6 years ago
    19. 2:44:46
      Prof. Timur Kuran on "The Portal", Episode #004: "The Economics of Revolution and Mass Deception."Eric Weinstein220K views • 7 years ago
    20. 58:46
      The Century of the Self - Part 1: "Happiness Machines"JustAdamCurtis2.9M views • 10 years ago

    5 comments from Hacker News

    1. @conceptionNov 2023· in “EU Parliament Decides That Your Private Messages Must Not Be Scanned”

      I think there is a theme in this thread that misses a key aspect that I think Noam put well here - this video I think the idea that if an opposing idea went to an NRA friend and offered more money, in almost all cases they would refuse because the lobbying dollars aren’t to convince but to support someone who asked believes what you do. In some cases, probably like crypto laws, a politician might think “sure I don’t care or have an opinion, you bought some donations and I don’t hate your opinion so I’ll help out”, but that is a lot different than “you pay me x and I vote y.” I think taking the agency out of the politicians hands, in most cases, is the wrong perspective.

      CitesView on HN
    2. @mistermannNov 2019· in “How can you know what news is real?”

      A skeptical mind should immediately ask "wait, that sounds like a bit of a conspiracy theory, am I to believe Jeff Bezos is acting as an editor for the newspaper he owns?" Which is a perfectly valid question. Noam Chomsky explains to a BBC journalist how it can be accomplished much more cleverly: this video Reporter: How can you know that I'm self-censoring, how can you know that a journalist is self-censoring? Chomsky: I'm not saying you're self-censoring, I'm sure you believe everything you say. But what I'm saying is, if you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting.

      CitesView on HN
    3. @ahelwerJul 2022· in “The Pentagon uses a secret program to wage proxy wars”

      The point of analyzing structural incentives is that you don't need a conspiracy. Everyone involved actually believes they are fully and truthfully discharging their duties and fighting the good fight. None of them are walking around plotting how to pull the wool over the public's eyes. They wouldn't be hired if they believed otherwise; there's a famous clip of Chomsky making this point here: this video

      CitesView on HN
    4. @pannSunNov 2022· in “Vox journo says NYT tech reporters had mandate to not cover big tech positively”

      By hiring only the like-minded, top-down decisions can appear organic. In the words of Chomsky: I don't say you're self-censoring. I'm sure you believe everything you're saying. But what I'm saying is if you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting. - this video

      CitesView on HN
    5. @rbeckerJul 2020· in “Resignation Letter”

      Even ten times that many journalists will do you no good, when what they report is filtered according to some pre-concieved view of the world (or the journalists themselves are only hired if they share that view: this video ).

      CitesView on HN