Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    Cover of Changing Minds

    Changing Minds

    Andrea diSessa · 2000

    "While written at a level that anyone with a good acquaintance with high school science can understand, the book reflects the depth and breadth of the issues surrounding technology in education. Rejecting the simplistic notion that the computer is merely a tool for more efficient instruction, diSessa shows how computers can be the basis for a new literacy that will change how people think and learn. He discusses the learning theory that explains why computers can be such powerful catalysts for change in education, in particular, how intuitive knowledge is the platform on which students build scientific understanding. He also discusses the material and social reasons for the computer's potential and argues for "two-way literacies," where everyone is a creator as well as consumer of dynamic and interactive expressive forms. DiSessa gives many examples from his work using the Boxer computer environment, an integrated software system designed to investigate computational literacies."--Jacket.

    Psychology & Behavior
    Open LibraryAmazon
    Stats for nerds
    1recommend
    2mentions
    2people
    2015–2020years
    50% recommend50% neutral

    Mentions per year

    201520162017201820192020

    What Hacker News says

    1. scrootMar 2020
      > The whole point of the discussion around computer and computer languages/systems as tool for thought, is presuming that computing can be another form of mass literacy. Let's also not get into whether this should be the case (and my opinion here is less naive that one might think); I'm just saying that this is the debate.

      Exactly right. The Jobs line is a half-baked and perhaps half-understood take on the thinking of people like Kay, Papert, et al. Anyone curious about this line of thinking -- which has fallen way, way out of the popular computing discourse -- might want to check out Andrea diSessa's "Changing Minds" for a decent summary.

      thread
    2. abecedariusMay 2015
      Yes, and the remark at the post's bottom, "Structured editing wasn't actually a bad idea, it was just poorly executed." seems oblivious to Boxer -- I found it usable enough (and inspiring).

      diSessa's book http://www.amazon.com/Changing-Minds-Computers-Learning-Lite... has more on the philosophy and the experience with kids using it. The writing style's a bit of a slog.

      thread

    Related

    Cover of How to Change Your Mind
    2018–2026

    How to Change Your Mind

    Michael Pollan
    99 recommend · 192
    Cover of Mindset
    2007–2025

    Mindset

    Carol S. Dweck
    86 recommend · 144
    Cover of Mindware
    2010–2024

    Mindware

    Clark, Andy
    4 recommend · 4
    Cover of Other Minds
    2017–2026

    Other Minds

    Peter Godfrey-Smith
    34 recommend · 53
    Cover of Mindsight
    2010–2020

    Mindsight

    Daniel J. Siegel
    7 recommend · 8
    Cover of How Minds Change
    2022–2024

    How Minds Change

    David McRaney
    4 recommend · 4
    Cover of The Mind's I
    2007–2026

    The Mind's I

    Douglas R. Hofstadter
    36 recommend · 73
    Cover of A Mind for Numbers
    2014–2025

    A Mind for Numbers

    Barbara Oakley
    57 recommend · 91