
High in the Canadian Rockies is a small limestone quarry formed 530 million years ago called the Burgess Shale. It hold the remains of an ancient sea where dozens of strange creatures lived -- a forgotten corner of evolution preserved in awesome detail. In this book Stephen Jay Gould explores what the Burgess Shale tells us about evolution and the nature of history.
It might have only been a few paragraphs, but he explained that "Survival of the fittest" is not really quite how evolution works.
"Survival of the fittest" implies that species that are stronger or "better" in some way are the ones to survive and reproduce and thus "succeed" in evolutionary terms.
Stephen Jay Gould suggested that a better way of thinking about it is "Survival of the survivors", which is to say that in many cases its simply chance that allows once species to survive and thrive and breed successive generations.
Over the next hundred million years or so, the evolutionary innovation was mostly in smaller and smaller tweaks on some evolutionary branches, and the extinction of other branches as they were outcompeted. Never again was there the same wide range of innovation and experimentation--except following expansion into new environments (e.g. when organisms moved onto land) and following mass extinction events.
It is really interesting to see how research centers like PARC develop but you're absolutely correct in that it's easier to be creative with a clean slate.
Maybe we shouldn't be trying to emulate or reproduce PARC unless we have found a new clean slate somewhere. Instead we should look to where innovation develops particularly rapidly in spite of an establishment.
