
"What corporations fear most are consumers who ask questions. Naomi Klein offers us the arguments with which to take on the superbrands." Billy Bragg from the bookjacket.
It basically explains this mechanism in great detail.
* https://bookshop.org/p/books/no-logo-no-space-no-choice-no-j...
Or take a look at the opening sequence of Snow Crash, where the deliverator is clearly making fun of ubiquitous cyberpunk tropes. At the time it was considered a tombstone for cyberpunk, rather than some sort of positive signal milestone.
These are only two data points to demonstrate that the “counterculture” era had already expired in the US by the early 90s, as members of that counterculture felt that it had already stopped being counter to any part of American culture.
The claim that there is “not much Japanese counterculture” is too bizarre for me to wrap my head around. The more traditional a society is, the more “counter” any underground culture is —- by definition.
American counterculture hasn’t really properly existed outside of capitalist smother and capture since the early 90s either by the way. Give No Logo a read for more on that.
Brands are bad. If you value brands, I recommend you read No Logo by Naomi Klein. It will (all right, may) help you adjust your value system. It certainly did for me.
Right at the end he talks about executions and blanket bans on advertising while recommending an anarcho-capitalist book for its analysis of the 'zookeeper problem'. Do I have to be a much more intimate fan of George Hotz to understand how this is not confused?
If you're concerned about the presence of a virtue-seeking consumerist class, read No Logo instead of someone who endorses praxeology.
I should also mention Naomi Klein's No Logo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeTgLKNb5R0