
This bibliography contains more than 6,000 entries, with books annotated by Murray N. Rothbard, in a near-complete listing of articles by this Austrian journalist. It identifies for the first time unsigned editorials in the New York Times (1934-1946) which were actually written by Hazlitt, and reveals that he had a larger impact on our nation's intellectual life than anyone has yet realized. The contents of this work include: Introduction (Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.) Notes from the Compiler (Jeffrey A. Tucker) Books (Annotations by Murray N. Rothbard) Chapters in Books, Introductions, and Short Monographs Articles and Editorials ISBN 0945466161 158 pp.
Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt
Have been my personal, but somewhat one-sided favourites.
I suggest you read Man, Economy and State by Murray Rothbard. But if you want something shorter and quicker, try Economics in One lesson by Henry Hazlitt. Both are available free online.
- Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt
then couldn't stop reading all there is to read at Mises.org
* "End the Fed" by Ron Paul
* "Economics in One Lesson" by Henry Hazlitt
* "The Mystery of Banking" by Murray Rothbard
* "What has government done with our money?" by Murray Rothbard
* "Debt: The First 5000 Years" by David Graeber
http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/chap24p3.html
See also Murray Rothbard's discussion:
http://mises.org/money/2s9.asp
You may not agree with their analyses, but at least they can serve as a counter-narrative to the mainstream views you evidently support.
By the way, your comment can be improved by removing everything before "not all forms..." In that case, it would simply make a cogent point (though one with which I still take exception). As it stands, your comment comes across as petty and unrefined. Stay classy—it's nicer, and it's also more likely to persuade.