Skip to content
HomeVideosBooks
AllTopicsTrends
BlogsPodcasts
HistoryListsWatch laterLiked videosFollowing

The videos, books, blogs and podcasts Hacker News keeps recommending, all in one place.

VideosBooksBlogsPodcastsAboutPrivacySettings

Data from Hacker News, HackerTube, HackerBooks, HackerBlogs and Open Library. Credits · Not affiliated with Y Combinator.

HomeVideosBooksBlogsPodcasts
Ctrl K
    The Blocksize WarJonathan Bier

    The Blocksize War

    Jonathan Bier · 2021

    Economics & Finance
    Open Library
    Stats for nerds
    2recommend
    5mentions
    4people
    2022–2024years
    60% recommend40% neutral

    Mentions per year

    202220232024

    What Hacker News says

    1. abriosiFeb 2024
      Satoshi regularly took two spaces after a period. He uses vocabulary tied to British

      There is a famous British cryptographer called Adam Back, who is also the inventor of the proof of work method laid out on the paper “hashcash”. He also leaves two spaces after a period (or used too)

      I don’t think it really matters who created it. If you read the political story of bitcoin things look a lot clearer.

      “The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules” is a good entry point

      thread
    2. abriosiNov 2022
      Although I understand and upvoted I think the response is nuanced

      This is a good read:

      The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules https://g.co/kgs/4axiTg

      thread
    3. cflynnusSep 2022
      I don't think this is correct. The book "The Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier does a good job of covering this topic.
      thread
    4. britneybitchJan 2023
      To change the algorithm, all three of miners, users, and nodes would have to agree to the change. If there is any disagreement, the network continues running under current consensus rules.

      In fact, a majority of miners did try to strongarm a fork 5 years ago, and they failed, because the users did not agree. There was even been a book written about it. https://www.amazon.com/Blocksize-War-controls-Bitcoins-proto...

      If they tried again, they would fail again -- literally nobody would agree to a fork whose purpose is to enrich miners at the users' expense.

      thread
    5. majinuubJun 2022
      > Project direction controlled entirely by core devs and the centralised exchanges that bless their output as "bitcoin" regardless of the fact it directly contradicts the original consensus mechanism for the project and the changes implemented by said devs fundamentally broke the utility of the project.

      Core devs and exchanges do not entirely control the project direction. Non-backwards compatible changes cannot be made to Bitcoin without the miners AND node operators adopting the new client. It takes the cooperation of the devs, miners, and node operators to make a hard fork. "The Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier documents a bunch of failed hard fork attempts that were backed by a good number of devs, large miners, and large exchanges. They failed because the node operators were not on board.

      thread

    Related

    Cover of Barbarians at the gate
    2008–2026

    Barbarians at the gate

    Bryan Burrough
    49 recommend · 86
    Cover of Mastering Bitcoin
    2014–2025

    Mastering Bitcoin

    Andreas M. Antonopoulos
    39 recommend · 58
    Cover of Blockchain revolution
    2016–2020

    Blockchain revolution

    Don Tapscott
    6 recommend · 10
    Cover of Politics of Bitcoin
    2017–2022

    Politics of Bitcoin

    David Golumbia
    7 recommend · 10
    Cover of Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain
    2017–2025

    Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain

    David Gerard
    13 recommend · 32
    Cover of Security Analysis
    2008–2024

    Security Analysis

    Benjamin Graham
    12 recommend · 31
    Cover of Currency wars
    2012–2026

    Currency wars

    James Rickards
    recommend · 20
    6
    Cover of Grokking Bitcoin
    2020–2021

    Grokking Bitcoin

    Kalle Rosenbaum
    1 recommend · 3