...
"Open Access" ($7.47) https://www.amazon.com/Open-Access-Press-Essential-Knowledge...
Sources:
1. Peter Suber's Open Access monograph, chapter 5, p. 107-110 (itself open access, of course). https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Open_Access_(the_book) argues that OA books facilitate "searching and sampling," and then people want to read the whole thing in the nicer print format.
2. University of Michigan Press says it happens sometimes thanks to increased "awareness and visibility": https://www.press.umich.edu/openaccess
3. A phd thesis reviewing studies, and finding a negative relationship between OA and sales: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/68465
4. A swiss study of matched pairs of books, one OA, one traditional; no statistically significant difference in sales http://www.snf.ch/SiteCollectionDocuments/OAPEN-CH_schlussbe...
IEEE is making people $30 for a copy of it.
Check it out: http://goo.gl/1EwdLn
(click that big yellow Full Text button to see the price).
Aaron was vehemently against sites like IEEE, Elsevier, and JSTOR. Putting aside for a moment the ethical and moral questions, can a company choose to sell something that's licensed under CC or some other permissive license?
And if so, where does that money go? And IEEE, at least for IEEE membership, is a nonprofit. Is this legal?
I checked it out and there are other examples where they are charging for content that the authors released for free:
Engineering a Safer World:Systems Thinking Applied to Safety written by Nancy Leveson
From MIT Press: https://goo.gl/L05G3K
From IEEE: http://goo.gl/UJnv9L
They split that book into 25 individual chapters, each one costing $15, for a grand total of $375. And it's an extra $15 if you want the book cover/table of contents! http://goo.gl/QVmRvU)
Open Access by Peter Suber
From MIT Press https://goo.gl/yF0kB8
From IEEE http://goo.gl/N01xF2
That's the same as the other book, split into chapters and sold for $15 each.
There is no way an individual would fall for this. But libraries and universities may not be checking. I have seen tons of posts about publishers taking advantage of institutions. Is this another example to slip one past the librarian?