
https://www.amazon.com/Parkinsons-Law-C-Northcote-Parkinson/...
https://www.amazon.com/Law-Profits-Cyril-Northcote-Parkinson...
In-Laws & Outlaws (not on Amazon)
I found it super entertaining.
When I left Google in 2015 to go on sabbatical, I distributed 20 copies to various middle and upper-middle managers, mostly as friendly/jocular warning/admonishing.
When I returned in 2016, it seemed that one half had gotten the joke, and the other half had used it as a manual.
Either way: The linked article shows that the author has red-discovered Parkinson’s Law for himself.
(I recommend y’all read the book)
http://www.amazon.com/Parkinsons-Law-C-Northcote-Parkinson/d...
For my purposes (not a network admin), I still figure on 10 bps = 1 byte/s. Easier, and usually close enough, what with packet headers and network burps. So, 100MB*10b/10Mbps = 100 s.
P.S. just read OP's expansion on problem. I would recommend reading C.N.Parkinson's take on candidate search (ch. 5 of the Parkinson's Law book, e.g. http://www.02articles.com/read/parkinsons-law-chapter-5 ). If it does not actually help, at least you'll be amused.
P.P.S. searching for the above link, found this also amusing testimonial from a satisfied user: http://direkobold.blogspot.com/2009/04/parkinsons-law-for-hi...
It is the nature of bureaucracies to bloat, public or private, changing their aim from why they were originally created to self-propagation.
_Systemantics_ (aka _The Systems Bible_) is a great read on the topic, surpassing even Parkinson's essays (and as easy to read)
https://www.amazon.com/Systems-Bible-Beginners-Guide-Large/d...
https://www.amazon.com/Parkinsons-Law-C-Northcote-Parkinson-...
"To comprehend Factor I, we must picture a civil servant called A who finds himself overworked. Whether this overwork is real or imaginary is immaterial; but we should observe, in passing, that A’s sensation (or illusion) might easily result from his own decreasing energy—a normal symptom of middle-age. For this real or imagined overwork there are, broadly speaking, three possible remedies
(1) He may resign.
(2) He may ask to halve the work with a colleague called B.
(3) He may demand the assistance of two subordinates, to be called C and D.
There is probably no instance in civil service history of A choosing any but the third alternative. By resignation he would lose his pension rights. By having B appointed, on his own level in the hierarchy, he would merely bring in a rival for promotion to W’s vacancy when W (at long last) retires. So A would rather have C and D, junior men, below him. They will add to his consequence; and, by dividing the work into two categories, as between C and D, he will have the merit of being the only man who comprehends them both."