
One of the biggest problem areas for writers is conveying a character's emotions to the reader in a unique, compelling way. This book comes to the rescue by highlighting 75 emotions and listing the possible body language cues, thoughts, and visceral responses for each. Using its easy-to-navigate list format, readers can draw inspiration from character cues that range in intensity to match any emotional moment. The Emotion Thesaurus also tackles common emotion-related writing problems and provides methods to overcome them. This writing tool encourages authors to show, not tell emotion and is a creative brainstorming resource for any fiction project.
Once you have a handle on the feelings and what triggers them, I think you'll get some insight into the currently unknown reasons. I'd be you'll also have theories on how to work around it, but if not, a good therapist can help.
[1] https://brenebrown.com/book/atlas-of-the-heart/
[2] https://www.amazon.com/Emotion-Thesaurus-Writers-Character-E...
I have a collection of 1050 tuples with following information:
1. Emotion 1
2. Transition Type
3. Emotion 2
"Transition type" is either "escalates to" or "de-escalates to."
I took these data from "The Emotion Thesaurus" by Angela Ackerman and Becca Puglisi.
I want to create something visual which will allow me to better navigate in those emotions.
If I render these data with Graphviz Dot, I get a giant (42 MB) PNG file which is hard to navigate.
What graph algorithms can I use to transform this mess into something that I can make sense of (apart from creating separate diagrams for escalations and de-escalations which would reduce the number of edges)?
I am thinking about creating something like a subway map where you have "lines" with individual emotions being stations on those lines.
For example:
Acceptance -escalates-to-> Satisfaction -escalates-to-> Happiness
Acceptance, satisfaction and happiness would form a line.
The difference between subway lines and emotion lines is that with emotions the connections are not always bi-directional. That is, if acceptance escalates to satisfaction, it does not mean that satisfaction de-escalates to acceptance.
I appreciate any ideas.
Dmitrii Pisarenko
