
An irreverent, provocative, and visually fascinating look at what our online lives reveal about who we really are--and how this deluge of data will transform the science of human behavior. Big Data is used to spy on us, hire and fire us, and sell us things we don't need. In Dataclysm, Christian Rudder puts this flood of information to an entirely different use: understanding human nature. Drawing on terabytes of data from Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, OkCupid, and many other sites, Rudder examines the terrain of human experience. He charts the rise and fall of America's most reviled word through Google Search, examines the new dynamics of collaborative rage on Twitter, and traces human migration over time, showing how groups of people move from certain small towns to the same big cities across the globe. And he grapples with the challenge of maintaining privacy in a world where these explorations are possible. Audacious, entertaining, and illuminating, Dataclysm is a portrait of our essential selves--and a first look at a revolution in the making.
> My take is that 99% of the men on there are immature man children whose life is a mess.
This is a completely ridiculous take. You sound like an asshole saying this. Have you met 99% of men using dating apps?
> was able to date a different attractive women every night if I wanted to
Statistically you are in the 90th percentile of attractiveness for men or you are lying. Either way your experience is highly atypical.
> If you want a good partner you have to be one. An app can’t do it for you.
This is a truism that doesn’t address or refute the many stated problems with dating apps.
> the quality of my dating experience depends entirely on me.
This is also a truism and completely moronic. I guess non-white people and disabled people, etc. who have a statistically more difficult time finding a partner on dating apps should just stop being so unattractive!
> Women actually have a worse time on these apps then men
We already discussed but this is irrelevant as to whether the experience is good for men.
> because despite lots of matches the guys all have serious issues they aren’t willing to admit or work on
What do you define as “lots of matches”? Because statistically the lower 50th percentile of men get like one or two matches a week, who are often below their standards of attractiveness. They surely aren’t dating “attractive women every night”.
TL;DR go read Dataclysm by Christian Rudder as well as many other studies and criticisms of dating apps because you are delusional about how dating apps work
https://www.amazon.com/Dataclysm-Christian-Rudder-audiobook/...
Back to the original point I was trying to make, in the chapter of the book on that topic (as opposed to his earlier data science blog posts), he uses not only OKCupid data, but Tinder and other dating apps as well. I remember there were a few small outliers, but in general that trend from the original data science blog posts still stands. Oh, and he also explicitly compares his old analysis vs. his present one. Definitely an interesting topic, and the book, luckily, applies similar rigor to a bunch of other topics completely unrelated to dating dynamics.
0. https://www.amazon.com/Dataclysm-Identity-What-Online-Offlin...