
"After examining the midcentury rise of cybernetics, the science of self-governing systems, and the emergence in the Soviet Union of economic cybernetics, Peters complicates this uneasy role reversal while chronicling the various Soviet attempts to build a 'unified information network.' Drawing on previously unknown archival and historical materials, he focuses on the final, and most ambitious of these projects, the All-State Automated System of Management (OGAS), and its principal promoter, Viktor M. Glushkov. Peters describes the rise and fall of OGAS -- its theoretical and practical reach, its vision of a national economy managed by network, the bureaucratic obstacles it encountered, and the institutional stalemate that killed it. Finally, he considers the implications of the Soviet experience for today's networked world."--Publisher description.
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27310479-how-not-to-netw...
From WIKI:
In 2016, a book dedicated to OGAS was published in the US, entitled How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet, by Benjamin Peters, professor at University of Tulsa. Harvard University professor Jonathan Zittrain commented that the book "fills an important gap in the Internet's history, highlighting the ways in which generativity and openness have been essential to networked innovation".[15] A reviewer of the book at MIT wrote:[16] "Soviet attempts to build a national computer network were undone by socialists who seemed to behave like capitalists".
In the interview, Peters states the reason the Internet appeared in Silicon Valley and not near Soviet Kiev was that "the capitalists behaved like socialists while the socialists behaved like capitalists". This challenges conventional notions about the relationship between society and technology and contradicts the often-stated belief about laissez faire economic freedoms and capitalism being necessary for the high-tech booms.
Peters also ponders what we might learn about current Internet state surveillance trends, such as the now-known NSA programs, by looking at the 1960's Soviet project called OGAS ("obshche-gosudarstvennaia avtomatizirovannaia sistema"). Its full title in English unashamedly gives away its intentions: "All-State Automated System for the Gathering and Processing of Information for the Accounting, Planning, and Governance of the National Economy, USSR".
It seems like the author either didn't have access to technical information, or opted to skip implementation details. That's really a shame, because I think that's the part that most of the potential readers would be interested in.
In the end I skipped to the last chapter of the book, which is the only part that's sort of interesting. Maybe I'm just disappointed because I expected the content to something different, based on the title and abstract.