
NICHOLAI HEL.... Born in the ravages of WWI China to an aristocratic Russian mother and a mysterious German father, raised in the spiritual gardens of a Japanese Go master, he survives the destruction of Hiroshima to emerge as the world's most artful lover and it's most accomplished and highly paid assassin. Genius, mystic, master of language and culture, Hel's secret is his determination to attain a rare kind of personal excellence, a state of effortless perfection..... shibumi. Now living in an isolated mountain fortress with his magnificent Eurasion mistress, Hel faces his most sinister enemy --- a super-monolith of espionage and monopoly. The battle lines are drawn, ruthless power and corruption on one side and on the other...... SHIBUMI Maybe the best book I've ever read.
(Note: Many of these contain some really ridiculous, outdated language and treatment of various groups of people.)
https://www.amazon.com/Shibumi-Novel-Trevanian/dp/1400098033
Up there with Edna from the Incredibles.
If you like Go, you'll enjoy Trevanian's Shibumi.
This looks like a great documentary and on one of my favorite subjects so donation submitted.
On a different note, I think a large percentage of TV programming in the near future will be financed like this (percentage by number, there will always be expensive blockbusters). Unfortunately due to constraints, the current Kickstarter model can back mostly documentaries but not miniseries, sitcoms, action movies, etc. But if Netflix or Amazon open their streaming pipes to third party content, a la the Apple all model, I think we'll see an explosion of such content.
"What Go is to philosophers and warriors, chess is to accountants and merchants"
If so, why is it not as popular as chess (outside Asia)? This could be examined at length but the fact that chess was used as one of the weapons of Cold War and its long history (Go has become popular in the West only in late 20th century) all should be considered. Yet, there might be some truth to Nicholai's (aka Trevanian, aka Whitaker) observation. The antagonistic nature of chess is much easier to grasp than the cold, crystalline-like beauty of Go's patterns.
As to your comment " I don't actually think humans really were bested by computers in chess", which is shared by others on this thread: The observations that computers play "ugly chess", the "thought" process is different, etc. stem from an romantic idealization of how the grandmasters are raised and train nowadays. I would very much suggest that you read the NYer article I linked (an another commentor summarized). The basic idea there is not that computers have learned to play an ugly version of brute force chess but humans (with the aid of their computerized tools) learned how to mechanically optimize their play, getting closer to computers.
― Trevanian, Shibumi
