
A team of explorers makes an expedition into a crater in Iceland which leads to the center of the earth and to incredible and horrifying discoveries.
No he didn't. The technology to build the submarine he imagined had not been implemented. Additionally, a cannon that could fire humans into space had not been implemented in 1865 when he wrote From the Earth to the Moon, and the interior of volcanos and the Earth's core had not been explored when he wrote Journey to the Center of the Earth.
I really think you're selling him short - he used cutting-edge scientific theories as inspiration for imaginative, speculative stories, he didn't limit himself to existing inventions. I have plenty of respect for Tom Clancy as well but they are very different writers with very different approaches.
simplified, there are two main branches:
- those who consume everything, kinda like maximizing the investment or "it makes me company"
- those who consume things that need to pass some kind filter
generated content would (maybe) reward the first group, but without some very good hit they will probably go back to downloading stuff, but not the second.
At least not yet and not in the foreseeable future.
There's a difference between computer aided content and computer generated.
Jurassic park wouldn't exist as it is without technology advancements, but the novel was already good.
Another example by Crichton is WestWorld. The original was written and directed by Crichton himself in 1973, the original movie is great, the second chapter is good, the tv-show is visually astonishing, but after 2 seasons, I stopped watching it. The material taken from the first two movies had ended and nothing really interesting have come out after from the writers (IMO).
Voyage au centre de la Terre (Journey to the Center of the Earth) is a great book from 1864 and I honestly prefer the movie from 1959 than the its latest 3D incarnation from 2008.
Not because older is better, but because the 1959 version is more centered around the story and it aged better.
Probably because Indiana Jones hadn't come out yet and the director didn't try to imitate it.
EDIT: fixed the name of the book, thank you bradyd.
Paris in the 20th century was also really cool to read. Almost every Jules Verne book has this unbridled optimism (especially pronounced in the American characters). But this book is dark. I kinda liked it for that. After reading so many Jules Verne books as a teenager, they all started to feel the same.