
Calculating God is the new near-future SF thriller from the popular and award-winning Robert J. Sawyer. An alien shuttle craft lands outside the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto. A six-legged, two-armed alien emerges, who says, in perfect English, "Take me to a paleontologist." It seems that Earth, and the alien's home planet, and the home planet of another alien species traveling on the alien mother ship, all experienced the same five cataclysmic events at about the same time (one example of these "cataclysmic events" would be the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs). Both alien races believe this proves the existence of God: i.e. he's obviously been playing with the evolution of life on each of these planets. From this provocative launch point, Sawyer tells a fast-paced, and morally and intellectually challenging, SF story that just grows larger and larger in scope. The evidence of God's universal existence is not universally well received on Earth, nor even immediately believed. And it reveals nothing of God's nature. In fact. it poses more questions than it answers. When a supernova explodes out in the galaxy but close enough to wipe out life on all three home-worlds, the big question is, Will God intervene or is this the sixth cataclysm:? Calculating God is SF on the grand scale. Calculating God is a 2001 Hugo Award Nominee for Best Novel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating_God?useskin=vector
"The Sparrow"
"Lord of Light"
"The Immortal"
"Hyperion"
"The Last Question"
"Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"
"Stranger in a Strange Land"
"The City and the Stars"
"Childhood's End"
"Anathem"
"Eifelheim"
"A Case of Conscience"
"VALIS" trilogy
"The Book of Strange New Things"
"Behold The Man"
"The God Engines"
"Book of the New Sun"
"The Parable of the Sower"
"The Dosadi Experiment"
"Grass"
"Project Pope"
"Calculating God"
"Factoring Humanity"
"Jesus on Mars"
"Surface Detail
If you hand-wave away skeptical inquiry of a topic, then yes, it can remain within the realm of the supernatural, but that is hardly an endorsement, it simply means you aren't willing to subject the topic to investigation with all the tools at our disposal, or at least are unwilling to eschew tools that have proved unreliable (such as circular logic).
Your argument basically boils down to "The spontaneous emergence of life in a universe consistent with the materialistic and naturalistic worldview is so unlikely that we must attribute it to a cause that cannot be accounted for from within that worldview."
To which I say: "It almost doesn't matter how unlikely the emergence of life is, since if life hadn't emerged we wouldn't be having this argument". This is of course the anthropic principle. Which isn't to say that determining the likelihood isn't important and interesting! Just that it isn't particularly relevant to the question of whether the emergence of life can be explained from within a naturalistic and materialist worldview.
You would have to prove that the emergence of life is not only unlikely, but actually impossible, in order to demonstrate that a non-naturalistic origin is required.
Well, actually, to be thorough, that isn't the only possible avenue of proving your point if view, but other avenues would require more data than we currently have, and would require that data to point in directions that demonstrate the universe having agency and intent of some sort.
You might enjoy the science fiction novel Calculating God, by Robert J. Sawyer, which riffs a bit on this theme:
Somewhat spoilery summary is on Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculating_God
To give a hypothetical example of the kind of future evidence that could support your argument that nevertheless doesn't spoil the plot of that novel, imagine that buried within the non-coding and non-regulatory genomes of many different life forms on earth there were a message (Bible Code style). The message isn't identical everywhere, mutations do degrade it, but just as often over evolutionary times scales mutations correct the errors. There is no explicable mechanism for these corrections, that demonstrate ongoing interference for no reason than the preservation of the message. Furthermore, the message gets longer in larger genomes, and has expanded in similar ways in species otherwise not particularly related, and to an extent that cannot be attributed to known mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer.
Further, imagine that we discover life elsewhere in the solar system (for example on Titan, or Europa). These extraterrestrial life forms don't particularly resemble Earth's, differing in to he chiralitt of their protiens an do sugars, using sightly different genetic coding and transcription mechanisms, but buried within their own junk genes there are, astonishingly similar messages encoded differently, preserved and expanded upon in sync with Earth's over eons, without there being any explicable means of sharing that data and no other between classes that are otherwise incompatible in encoding, metabolism, or basic chemistry (Titan's life uses methane and ethane as solvents instead of water).
That would be a pretty convincing argument for their being a "supernatural" entity being responsible for creating life and chivvying it along. Whether that entity is also responsible for the creation of the universe is a separate argument, but perhaps there is further evidence somehow encoded within the fabric of spacetime's various universal constants (eg. Contact buried a message deep within the digits of Pi).
It was, for me, the turning point from reading what I now recognize to be mostly trash (primarily very early 'Star Wars' expanded universe books) to instead looking for things that had real impact. Books that made me think.
Not everything he's written has been as good, but I read whatever this man publishes- even blog posts about old text editors.
-Dune
-Hyperion + The Fall of Hyperion
-The Book Of The New Sun
-Ilium + Olympos
-Takeshi Kovacs trilogy
-The Culture Series (meh..)
-The Demolished Man
More dev-oriented:
-Reamde (which I hated, but I seem to be in a minority)
-Neuromancer
I'll always have a special place in my heart for Calculating God (not science fiction), because its the book that got me into reading seriously.
