
"This textbook offers a comprehensive and self-contained introduction to the field of machine learning, based on a unified, probabilistic approach. The coverage combines breadth and depth, offering necessary background material on such topics as probability, optimization, and linear algebra as well as discussion of recent developments in the field, including conditional random fields, L1 regularization, and deep learning. The book is written in an informal, accessible style, complete with pseudo-code for the most important algorithms. All topics are copiously illustrated with color images and worked examples drawn from such application domains as biology, text processing, computer vision, and robotics. Rather than providing a cookbook of different heuristic methods, the book stresses a principled model-based approach, often using the language of graphical models to specify models in a concise and intuitive way. Almost all the models described have been implemented in a MATLAB software package--PMTK (probabilistic modeling toolkit)--that is freely available online"--Back cover.
Please also check the review here [2]. For what it's worth, the book is listed in the "10 Books Every Network Engineer Should Read" [3].
[1] Machine Learning for Network and Cloud Engineers: Get ready for the next Era of Network Automation:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/101180344-machine-learni...
[2] MUST READ: Machine Learning for Network and Cloud Engineers:
https://blog.ipspace.net/2023/02/machine-learning-network-cl...
[3] 10 Books Every Network Engineer Should Read:
https://networkphil.com/2024/05/21/10-books-every-network-en...
for something more directly comparable to the niche ISLR filled, Bishop’s books are generally better - although I can’t recall their title
The book, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective by Kevin Murphy (the original book everyone in this thread is talking about) is probably the closest thing I can think of. Its goal is to frame everything around graphical models and probability. It's quite a tome. Still, despite its breadth, it can't possibly cover everything.