
Explores the accidents of time, place, and circumstance that culminated in the century's technological achievements: the computer, the telephone, the production line, the airplane, the atomic bomb, the guided rocket, plastics, and television
Also Douglas Coupland's 'Microserfs', described as "Here's a guy who seems to have spent a week with engineers and effortlessly absorbed everything that is important about engineering culture, everything that matters about working at a big company, and everything that matters about working at a startup." https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2748.Microserfs
<https://openlibrary.org/search?isbn=9780333248270>
There's Joseph Needham's Science and Civilisation in China though that's not exactly a coffee-table book. It's staggering in its own way, however:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_Civilisation_in_Ch...>
That is partially true. There is no incentive, for example, for slaves to make any improvements. I cannot think of any technology developed by slaves. That meant the few people in power were not enough to think of much new stuff.
You could say free markets were the greatest invention, because it incentivized everyone to be a creator.
The evolution of guns is an interesting topic. So is the evolution of sailing ships. The latter occurred over thousands of years. Very very slow!
You might want to investigate James Burke's "Connections" book and series. It's an entertaining overview of the history of invention.
The penny dropped for me whilst reading James Burke's Connections on the exceedingly-delayed introduction of the lateen-rigged sail to Europe, largely on the basis that the syndicates which underwrote (and insured) shipping voyages wouldn't provide financing and coverage to ships so rigged.
Far more recently we have notions of redlining for both mortgage lending and insurance coverage (title, mortgage, property, casualty) in inner-city housing and retail markets. Co-inventor of packet-based switching writes of his parents' experience with this in Philadelphia:
"On the Future Computer Era: Modification of the American Character and the Role of the Engineer, or, A Little Caution in the Haste to Number" (1968)
<https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3780.html> (footnote, p. 6).
Similarly, government insurance or guarantees (Medicare, SSI, flood insurance, nuclear power plants) has made high-risk prospects possible, or enabled effective services and markets, where laissez-faire approaches would break down.
I propose that similar approaches to issues such as privacy violation might be worth investigating. E.g., voiding any insurance policy over damages caused through the harmful use or unintended disclosure of private information. Much of the current surveillance-capitalism sector would instantly become toxic. The principle current barriers to this are that states themselves benefit through such surveillance, and of course the current industry is highly effective at lobbying for its continuance.
- Technics & Civilization
- The Culture of Cities
- The Story of Utopias
Lewis Mumford talks about technology, but from an anthropological pint of view.
Another book I would recommend is The Nature of Technology by Brian Arthur
The other I would recommend is James Burk's Connections he's has some books but I but the documentary is highly recommended.
Tim Urban (whose recent work I'm not especially enamored of) wrote about this a bit and came up with an interesting visual[0]. Not so much a map about events, but placing famous figures side-by-side so you see whose lives overlapped in time which is not always intuitive.
It also sounds like you really need to watch or read "Connections" by James Burke.
> Connections explores an "Alternative View of Change" (the subtitle of the series) that rejects the conventional linear and teleological view of historical progress. Burke contends that one cannot consider the development of any particular piece of the modern world in isolation.
